LETTER FOUR: LETTER TO THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY REQUESTING ‘OVERSIGHT OR IMPEACHMENT’ OF A DISTRICT COURT JUDGE IN A TITLE VII CASE.
Note to the Reader:
This letter conveys to the reader, yet, another proof that systemic persecution I face on the North American continent and, institutional discrimination I have suffered with the Title VII employment Discrimination case have been approved by the United States Congress. This letter exemplifies the institutionalized nature of fraud, corruption and politico-bureaucratic conspiracy to rob me of justice in the Title Vii case in violation of my substantial rights, and, in fulfillment of the peonage-enslavement program to benefit the likes of Nancy Pelosi, Condoleeza Rice and Barbara Boxer. By now, the reader should have realized that the pattern of the ‘DA’ concept permeates activities described by these letters. ‘Da,’ or ‘sleep,’ because, America would not allow you to shine. American must take advantage of you. This appears to be an official United States policy against me. So, the indifference, inaction and silence, which characterize the behavior of institutions or personalities about who you read in these letters, have been in fulfillment of the “DA POLICY.”
I sent this letter to the United States House of Representatives Committee on Judiciary on the advice of the United States Senate Committee on Judiciary in the fall of 2006. When the courts indicated that they would rob me of justice in the Title Vii case, I decided to seek “Congressional Oversight or Impeachment” of Hon. Jenkins, in the belief that the Chairman at the time, Senator Arlen Specter, would come to the aid of this embattled African. I submitted copies of my report or request to the ranking Democrat and other members of the committee via email. After weeks’ passage and no replies forthcoming, I contacted the office of Sen. Specter about my request. I was told that I should have started from the House Committee. I promptly did so. This happened in early November 2006. I sent copies of the request to all members of the Committee. In the middle of November 2006, I contacted the office of the House Judiciary Committee again to verify the status of my request. I was told that, basically, “the dog ate the documents.” “Due to the Democrats’ victory in the November elections, there had been committee changes, so the documents may be with the GOP staff, now the minority staff or, ‘missing.’ “The best thing for you to do is to re-send the documents,” the staffer said something to that effect. Ostensibly disappointed, still, I promptly did as I was requested to do, because, I could not live with such injustice. The cover letter after the main letter below proves what I did. I called back in December for feed back on my request. This time, the individual in the Chairman’s office [Democrat] indicated that he would connect me with the staff on the sub-committee on Courts. There, I was connected to a lady to who I explained my case. She appeared to have looked for and found my file. She asked me to call her back within a couple of weeks, because, they just retrieved the file. I called back in about three weeks, and, went through the same ordeal of connections. But the lady from the sub-committee on courts pretended as if she had never heard of the matter. I took all the time to give her the details and my particulars, but, she indicated that she did not have my file, “so you would have to re-file and I would be glad to look at the file.” I told her that” “Please, do not lie to me, because, you have my file,” She became angry and said, “I will not take the abuse from you.” Then, she hanged up. Apparently frustrated, I called back to the office of the Chairman of the Committee to speak with the gentleman to who I had been talking. I told him what had happened, and, he said that, “If the Supreme Court had already decided the case, then, the committee would not be able to do anything about it.” I reminded him that I contacted the Committee long before the said decision by the Supreme Court. Since the delay was not my fault, I insisted that something had to be done about the matter. He grudgingly told me that he would look into the matter and get back to me. But, then, he indicated thus: “I have to tell you the truth. You are wasting your time by calling this office.” When I said, “Pardon me,” he said, “You are wasting your time calling this office, because, if you call here, you call the BOXER. The BOXER is the one you are talking to.”
So once again, you the reader and I have met the BOXER. I also know the boxer as the CONTAINER. Is this the same ‘BOXER’ I have heard of in San Francisco and the Bay Area? You the reader and I are on the path of discovery, tracking down this feared evil, mean assassin. If you are American, is this how you would like constitutional matters decided in your judicial system? By the way, is it probable that the said BOXER influenced, or, even, issued the Supreme Court decision on this case? Would you suggest that this matter be investigated? If you know a lawyer or a law firm that would be interested in this human or civil rights case, please, direct them to this website. I am preparing an extra website, Ohenethinkslegal, where copies of the actual briefs on these cases and decisions on them would be fully published. I have to indicate here that I also contacted the Office of the Solicitor General [OSG] for an Amicus Curae on this Title Vii case. The OSG could not help, because, according to the letter sent to me, the Supreme Court had already rendered decision on the case on December 22, 2006. However, I sought help another time when the decision had not been made. But the OSG refused on the excuse that the United States was not party to the case. I further explain this at my other website ohenethinkslegal.
Now, proceed to the letter. oby.
NOTE TO HON. MEMBERS OF U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATTIVES COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY:
Last week I filed a report with the 'Committee' asking for a judge to be impeached at the U.S. District Court in San Francisco, or, for the Committee to oversee a Title Vii employment discrimination case in which both the said judge and the clerk's office at the Ninth Circuit have joined with others in conspiracy to deny me justice. The urgency of the matter is there may be members of either the current of incoming Congress and government operatives who may be incriminated in this case. My life is in danger as a result. The operative concept here is 'taking advantage of.' This may not be a new song in the beltway.[….deleted]. My pleading to this committee is, "Please, uphold the constitution of the United States and promptly look into this matter." Below, please, find a copy of the cover letter for the report. Thank you. oby.
To: U.S. House Committee Judiciary, 2178 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington, D.C. 20515
From: Ohene Boakye-Yiadom, 1230 Market street, No. 352, San Francisco, CA 94102.
Re: Impeachment of a United States District Court Judge in San Francisco.
November 17, 2006.
Dear Hon. Members of the U.S. House Judiciary Committee:
I wish most respectfully to request the United States House of Representatives Committee on Judiciary to immediate institute an investigation and impeachment action against the Hon. Martin J. Jenkins, a District Court Judge of the United States District Court for Northern California, San Francisco and the Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, San Francisco, for their role in the conspiracy to defraud me, obstruct justice, and, deny me due process and equal protection in a Title Vii case that I brought to the District Court 2001. This conspiracy to deny me ‘standing’ before courts [In the case of the Ninth Circuit] established by Acts of this house for redress of violation of rights created by this house and the U.S. Constitution, also, involves Morrison and Foerster, LLP of Palo Alta, CA [attorneys of record for the defendants in this case] and the defendants themselves, CDS Leopold Group of Fremont, CA [formerly of San Carlos, CA]. The plot to deny me adequate and effective hearing, further, includes extrajudicial cohorts, in particular, politicians from the bay area [especially San Francisco], high level governmental operatives, law enforcement, the media, African Americans and Mexicans immigrants, lawyers from both this country and Canada, businesses and feminists. These feminists operate under the umbrella of United States institutions, and perhaps, Congress. This conspiracy is part of a wider systemic eugenics and torture conspiracy against me for which I will soon file cases against Canada, United States and leading institutions and individuals from these countries. This conspiracy is linked to the wider conspiracy as “the program to deprive and take advantage of a stupid African.” Hon. Members on this committee who have served at least a year in the house might have read some of my numerous pleading emails on the matter. Hon. Members would recollect then that they have refused to take action on the wider conspiracy because they have been advised to IGNORE me and let me die, etc. The purpose of this particular request is to plead with the committee to determine for punishment all those involved in this conspiracy to defraud me and the system, and to use the judiciary system to pursue racist, ethnocentric, religious, gender and other forms of persecution against me, violating my civil and human rights and undermining the integrity of the judiciary process. I have cited several provisions of Title 18 and Title 42 in court papers that I filed [Copies to be published at ohenethinkslegal.com . But, this case has far reaching constitutional, political and international implications. The immediate and main focus of this report, unfortunately, is Hon. Martin J. Jenkins, Judge and the Clerk of the Ninth Circuit, Cathy Catterson. If they did not agree to co-operate and conspire with the “opposition” [the myriad of groups, organizations and individuals that have nothing in common except the consensus to destroy me] with the purpose of denying me justice, I would have won my Title Vii case in 2002.
HON. MARTIN J. JENKINS, Judge.
1.He conspired with Morrison and Foerster, LLP and non- or extra judicial elements, and, clerks of the District Court [Ms. Sheila Rash] to deny me default judgment when CDS Leopold Group failed to respond to the complaint and summons in the fall of 2001 and winter of 2002. See FRCiv.P. Rules 5 and 55.
2. As the record shows and discussion in the enclosed brief indicate, he denied me summary judgment on March 19, 2002, August 15, 2002 and October 22, 2002. Debunking the notion of peremptory or interlocutory motions, the Ninth Circuit refused to review these decisions. See FRCiv.P. Rule 56 and 28 USC 2292 et seq.
3. He conspired with Morrison and Foerster, LLP to conceal information on the case reflected by an elusive and controversial ‘motion’ I labeled EXHIBIT 8. The lead attorney for CDS then, Mr. Kevin Mulcahy is directly linked to this mysterious motion that could have ended the case in March or April 2002.
4. He gridlocked the case for over two years, after he realized that I could win. This gridlocked followed an EX PARTE LETTER written to the judge by Ms. Elaine Gonzales [one of the attorneys for CDS and a suspect for obstruction in this case] for the defendants, requesting the judge not to hear my motions for summary judgment, particularly, the motion the court had granted leave to file for a September 22, 2002 hearing. This ex parte letter is of particular concern to me, because, the author or authors have used such letters to destroy my life since the late eighties when I was a student in Canada. In this country, the same people have used such letters to interfere with my doctoral applications, police records, professional pursuits, occupational and social life, etc. Recently, they used similar letters to enter memo in my immigration documents asking for me to be deported. I had to raise hell with the Ombudsman at USCIS and Homeland Security to get the people off my back [See letter 5]. A copy of a letter reflecting that memo is enclosed as EXHIBIT 30. In this case, the judge followed instructions/orders/ from that letter to deny me justice. A revised copy of the letter is herein attached as EXHIBIT SC. 18. The important thing here is that this letter links people who interfered in the case and threaten to kill me, if I do not SHUT UP. As you can tell, I will not. The gridlock had other purposes. These included the intent for Judge Jenkins to give the ‘opposition’ enough time to kill me in San Francisco as it was anticipated, enough time to immerse me into homosexuality and gay culture to destroy my lineage, or, at least, to damage me socially or biologically [with HIV/Aids]. Chemical castration of me remains a top priority of the ‘program.’ The gridlock also allowed Morrison and Foerster, LLP to reconstruct the case with framed facts. This petition full of On August 29, 2002, two weeks after Judge Jenkins issued his findings on the matter [Appendix B], Mr. Daniel Waldman, an attorney from Morrison and Foerster filed a document meant to be the reply to the complaint. This would be the third reply. The first two attempts to reply were filed by Mr. Kevin Mulcahy and Ms. Elaine Gonzales. Both are marked Exhibits SP 15A and 15B respectively. The intent of Mr. Waldman to defraud the court and me was incontrovertible. But, Judge Jenkins overlooked it. He ignored my protest of this naked act of robbery.
5. He refused to remove himself from the case, after he was automatically disqualified by virtue of CCP 170.3 et seq. and 42 USC 455. This due process violation is extensively discussed in papers enclosed and in the record. Again, the Ninth Circuit refused to hear the motion to disqualify Judge Jenkins.
6. Hon. Jenkins set aside his earlier finding in the case, without legal explanation, and, adopted new facts with which he gave judgment to CDS Leopold. This is discussed in the brief with reference to Appendices SC.B and SC.K.
7. Hon. Jenkins covered up a very important aspect of the case, sexual harassment and drugging, etc., which had implications for 18 USC 1091. With this he covered up the homosexual persecution and torture of, which I continue to suffer, biological warfare involving some leading politicians and feminists and discrimination based on national origins. He also covered up, in a very serious way, the African American component of this human crime.
8. He refused to set the void and fraudulent judgments aside. He even refused to prosecute a writ for habeas corpus asking for same relief or explanation thereof.
9. Judge Jenkins rebuffed my suggested evidence that some of the attorneys for CDS Leopold Group [from Morrison and Foerster, LLP of Palo Alto] could have been members of the U. S. Dept. of Justice in the Bay Area. But it is now known that the lead attorney, Mr. Kevin Mulcahy, has been Assistant United States Attorney since the spring of 2002. Could this be a case of colorable violations, state oppression or the work of a few bad apples for the USDOJ? Certainly, there was a conspiracy and probably misrepresentation to deny me justice, and, the judge was part of this conspiracy.
THE NINTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS;
1. The crime of the Ninth Circuit is that the Clerk’s office has simply prevented me from seeking appeal in this and other cases. This happened three times in this case alone. I filed a petition for ‘extraordinary relief ‘on September 25, 2006. But, I have not heard from that court on that matter. I place the blame squarely at the feet of the Clerk, Cathy Catterson [a likely feminist link] and a couple other clerks or deputy attorneys. I believe that they believe that I have no rights to appear in court. But, I know that I have standing under the First Amend., Fourteenth Amendment, Title Vii and Title 42 to appear in that court.
2. They [the Clerk’s office] used forged orders and judgments to intimidate me and frustrate my efforts to seek justice as the records indicate. All the unsigned orders are forged and false, unless this committee says otherwise. Even when orders were signed, signatures were forged or were from the wrong people [those not empowered to issue judgments].
3. The Ninth Circuit refused to investigate three reports of misconduct that I filed against Hon. Jenkins in this case. Lame excuses were given. I doubted that the Chief Judge Hon. Schroeder issued those orders. Some big and powerful names have been mentioned in connection with these orders and the ex parte letter. Some ‘Abramoff or Foley’ hovers over my life’s horizon and that of this case. Please, catch these people.
4. The Ninth Circuit dismissed my appeal efforts and closed the case, citing my failure to pay filing fees, when I hand an INFORMA PAUPERIS STATUS from the District Court. The claim was that Hon. Jenkins [disqualified] closed the case claiming that my appeal was based on bad faith. Records at the Ninth Circuit in this regard point to forgery or false statements, because, Hon. Jenkins directed his clerks to send documents on the case to the Ninth Circuit to enable me seek an appeal or review of his decisions.
5. Why did the Nine Judges who names appear on Ninth Circuit documents allow their names to be used in a fraudulent conspiracy? Have these high profile judges been part of the fraud and conspiracy?
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
The case has been to this high court a couple of times. See Appendix M and Exhibit 25 enclosed.
1. In my first attempt to get the court to force Hon. Jenkins to withdraw from the case, the court finally issues a decision on October 10, 2004 and refused to hear. The Case number was 04-6087.
2. A motion for rehearing was denied in February 2005.
3. An attempt to file a certiorari early 2006 was rebuffed by the Clerk’s office, because it was 2 days late. A follow up motion to the Chief Justice pleading “excusable neglect” was refused by the clerk’s office [See Letter 3]. I was late in filing, because I lost my laptop with an almost completed version of the writ and all backup copies on December 31, 2005. I had to start all over again using per hour purchase computer time. Notice how rigidly the law has been applied to me and how loosely it has been applied to defendants and the judge in this case, and you would understand the nature of the conspiracy. Again, at the Supreme Court of the United States, the clerk’s office has been ‘penetrated’ by the opposition, allegedly led by Senator Barbra Boxer of California and another local figure, one of whose several nicknames is ‘the boxer.’ [This is the individual who I described in the Note to the Reader as the one to whom the Secretary to the Chairman of the House Committee on Judiciary [Majority/Democrat] said I was talking when I called the Committee early 2007].
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
I made futile efforts to get the Department of Justice and the offices of the Attorney-General and the Solicitor-General in this case, but, they refused to assist [See Letters One, Two, Three, Five and…... In San Francisco, I reported this case as part of the larger persecution and torture, etc. I face to the FBI as far back as the late 1990s. They refused to take action. This September, I filed a report with the office of the United States Attorney in San Francisco about this particular. I have heard nothing from them. Just like the courts, the DOJ has decided to follow the disgraceful conduct of concealment and cover up to shield politicians and political operatives whose hatred nurtured and sustains this crime [This ethnic cleansing fused with deprivation, peonage, involuntary servitude and eugenics must be condemned by all well-meaning people throughout the world. The rest of the world must demand explanation from the United States. The rest of the world must demand to know why the United States has an official policy to allow African Americans kill, maim, undermine and hurt Africans for ‘revenge,’ because, all these factors ‘underline’ my case].
NO AVENUES FOR ADEQUATE REDRESS
As you can tell, I have no other legal avenue for legal redress except to bring a different action against the conspirators, including the judge. This therefore is the right time for some form of Congressional oversight to bring light to this case. The ‘new direction’ being heralded after the November elections must impact this case and my life so that the cruel, wicked and inhuman treatment I have been subjected to since 1995 would cease. I believe that every conscientious American would balk at the notion that I am a subject of enslavement education program in a country with a checkered past of ill treatment of people of African descent. This lack of racial and ethnic respect and sensitivity is a disgrace for a country that touts itself as the mother of all democratic and freedom loving societies [I remind you of the Thirteenth Amendment and the Civil Rights Act of 1964 et seq.]. If this committee does not repeat the practice of the courts to cover up this case, then, this would be the beginning of the unveiling of the eugenics torture and persecution programs, which the system has imposed on me since 1985. It must be the end of the “seizure to torture, educate, deprive, molest, mock and take advantage of programs” imposed on me. It must be the end of ethnic cleansing. I watched President Clinton apologize for the evilness of the Tuskegee Project [1995] in which 399 black men were used for syphilis research and were made to drop dead one by one as chicken stricken by the influenza epidemic. Unfortunately, my case shows that the ‘tearful apology’ of President Clinton was a total deception. Time will be soon when that issue would be addressed. For now, I have no other way to get justice in this case, because, Hon. Martin J. Jenkins [African-American] appears to be holding fort for all ‘avengers,’ reparation wailers, rent seekers and peonage madams, slave owners, etc. So is supported by African Americans and white people whose desire is to see me suffer till I die [Since 2000, this has become the objective of the City and County of San Francisco]. Silence, inaction and indifference have greeted my pleas thus far, because, it is alleged that American leaders want me to suffer irreparable damage before they act on this matter. Some rumor even indicates that unless I go to the world court, America would never response. If this is true, then, it is an imprudent policy towards a person who has not broken an inch of U.S. law, who came here to seek political asylum. The most prudent step for the Committee to take is to ignore those who would advise them to ignore me. This would save America from a lot of embarrassment.
The issue for now, however, is the matter of my Title Vii case, which fundamentally lies with Hon. Jenkins and the Ninth Circuit, and the fraud or conspiracy they engaged in to deny me justice. I have raised a series of questions about the conduct of the Ninth Circuit that need further probing. Unless this crime is exposed as the FRAUDULENT SCANDAL that it is, we would only be hitting at the tip of the iceberg. The public here wants everything covered up: In other words, I should die or be killed. This Title Vii case, however, is the first of four cases by which I seek to unravel crimes against humanity committed against me by the people and governments of this country during the last twelve years. Therefore, I would like the committee to take immediate action on this case that would reveal the truth to the American people. The American people deserve to know the truth. As I said, I have fully described the case in the brief. So enclosed, please, find a copy of my petition for extraordinary relief with appendices and exhibits, and, a copy of the letter to Mr. Derek Owens, Special Assistant to the United States Attorney in San Francisco. I will be glad to provide further information should that be necessary. The four files on the case at the District Court have been taken away to a Federal documentary storage in San Bruno, CA. So it has not easy for me to get access to some of the documents. The Ninth Circuit opened three files on the case. The last time I visited that court all the files were still at the court.
SENATORS AND REPRESENTATIVES FROM THE AREA:
Have I contacted Senators or representatives from the area about the case? Yes, I have and they do not care. They are either involved in the crime, or, they are protecting their colleagues heavily invested in this crime against humanity. I reported the matter to the offices of Senators Boxer, Feinstein and Rep. Pelosi’s here in San Francisco. I also sent several letters to U.S. Senators and Representatives, including those from California and San Francisco. The San Francisco offices of Senators Fienstein and Boxer opened ‘files’ on the case on two different occasions, respectively. After months of ‘study’ they both indicated to me that they could not help me. I should indicate that reports, which I made, included the issue of the whole persecution and torture I face in this country [confined to San Francisco since 1997]. I particularly remember that Senator Boxer’s local office response included the statement that this matter was ‘legal,’ and not ‘political,’ so I should go to court with it. I received a similar reply from Senator Boxer via email. As I have learned, she [Sen. Boxer] has been the one going to the courts to use feminists and certain types of Asians or minorities to interfere in the cases. She is involved in my whole persecution and torture, ‘big time.’{Senator Boxer, however, has a shadow simply known in San Francisco and the Bay Area as ‘the boxer.’ This dangerous entity has its ‘finger print’ on this case. I believe that a thorough investigation of the matter would definitely expose the ‘boxer’].
What of Rep. Nancy Pelosi? I believe that it would be safest for her to openly clear her name in this matter before she assumes the role of the Speaker. Did anybody remember that in 2003 $100,000 were found in the campaign funds of a Bay Area democrat for which proper accounting with regard to ‘sources of contribution’ were questioned. The San Francisco Examiner reported this matter in one of its issues in either October or November 2003. Rumor that money from this case has been paid to some people since the summer of 2002 is not yesterday’s news in San Francisco. San Francisco is presently, agog with layers of fortune hunters ready to take advantage of this stupid Africa. These investors and fortune hunters, are therefore, involved in all sorts dangerous means to kill me for the reward. African-American women known here as the ‘Sisters’ [Sistas], black Muslims, the police [I cannot make them out of the gangs], gays, lawyers, even the homeless, have their own ‘programs’ targeting me. Why? This is so because the tone for such widespread ‘disrespect and dehumanization’ has been set by leaders of this country. [The indifference and the silence of United States leaders have emboldened hired assassins, who in turn rent elements of the SFDP for their dirty work, to stage intimidating raids on me]. In August this year, my newest laptop was stolen from the main library in San Francisco where I sat researching and writing the enclosed petition. Everybody in San Francisco knows who took it. They track me to steal my things as part of the ‘deprive him of everything program.” This time it is said that “somebody’ wanted to have the essay I was developing for my doctoral degree. Another version claims that ‘they’ heard that I was about to leave San Francisco, so they had to take away the computer from me [I bought it with Bay Area money] as part of the ‘deprivation program.’ People who believe that I should not be allowed to win a case in San Francisco and take away Bay Area’s money are involved in this conspiracy. African American officials from the city and area and people from the media top the list on bent on denying me justice in this case.[A well-known African American Pastor in San Francisco angry that by suing CDS Leopold I sued his ‘buddies,’ has been given his own street gangs and police to use against me. They pray against me, cast spells against me, stage raids on me ….].
I have a second case that has been interfered with in a similar way by these people for which I believe that many people have to go to jail. Soon, I will be reporting on that, because, the State Courts have been prevented from rendering justice. And, as in this case, federal courts in San Francisco already beholden to these super politicians who seek to assassinate me and take advantage of me, etc. could not be a match the might of the discriminatory and apprehensive aminus from these forces.
I am in the process of contacting Rep. Lantos’ office in district 12 with a report on the serious human rights violations this entails. I deserve justice in this case and those who conspired to obstruct it and defraud me must be punished, even if this would amount to impeachment of the Hon. Judge. As you know there are several scandals involving congress and other government operatives these days. One of the current cases, the case of Rep. Foley, is said to be about a powerful man who used his position to take advantage of ‘vulnerable individuals’ [under age pages]. Similarly, those who might have taken advantage of me in this case are powerful congressional and government operatives, lawyers, judges, business people, ethnic leaders, etc. who believe that because I am a foreigner and an asylum seeker, etc., I have no solid grounds from which to challenge them, should they steal from me. Like Rep. Foley, these people are wrong, they must be made to face the law. But, in this case, investigation begins with Hon. Martin Jenkins, who as the record indicates, conspired with Morrison and Foerster, LLP to give decision and judgment to CDS Leopold Group of Fremont [formerly of San Carlos] by refusing to obey the constitution. I therefore, most respectfully appeal to the Chairman and honorable members of the House Committee on Judiciary to use their good offices to back up this lone Africa [framed, misrepresented, despised, defamed and mischaracterized by U.S. officials and those who bore atavistic grudges against him], and, thereby, enhance the integrity and reputation of the federal judicial process.
Thank you.
Sincerely
Ohene Boakye-Yiadom.
To: United States House of Representatives Committee on Judiciary [Subcommittee on Courts], 2138 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington D.C. 20515.
ATTENTION: Majority Committee Staff.
From: Ohene Boakye-Yiadom, 1230 Market Street, No. 352, San Francisco, CA 94102.
February 14, 2007.
Dear Committee [Majority] On Judiciary:
Last October [2006] or thereabout, I filed a complaint requesting the Committee for either an 'Oversight' or "Impeachment' hearing on Hon. Martin J. Jenkins [Judge], U.S. District Court for Northern California and the Ninth Circuit for what I considered fraudulent and conspiratorial activities in a Title Vii employment discrimination case by which both courts 'fixed' me with a manifest miscarriage of justice. I made several calls to the committee, then, under Hon. Sensebrenner, but, I received no responses. About a fortnight ago, I called to get an update on the case. But, I was told by a member of the 'new majority' staff that my file could not be traced, and, that it may be missing in the mace of elections and change of committees. The staff member advised me to re-file the report. So herewith this letter is a copy of the full report as I submitted to the committee last fall. It comprises a copy of the 'writ of mandamus' I filed at the Ninth Circuit seeking relief from the manifest miscarriage of justice imposed by the courts [This is supplemented with most of the Appendices and Exhibits in the case]. Also enclosed are one copy of the letter I previously sent to the Committee, one copy of the letter I sent to the office of the United States Attorney in San Francisco about the matter, and, one copy of a letter sent to the attorney-general on the matter. I would appreciate it if the committee could inform me about steps being taken to deal with the matter. The previous report did not include 'Appendix AA.' This was issued on December 22, 2006 as my "Christmas Gift" by the Clerk's office at the Ninth Circuit, confident that the Judiciary Committee would ignore my request. The effort of this request, besides upholding my rights to protections of the First, Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments is to advocate for respect for the rule of law and the integrity of the judicial process. One cannot be in the wrong with such a request on behalf of one of the most enlightened legal systems in the world. This is true, even if leaders of this country hate the one making the request.
Finally, it is part of the problem of this case that certain elements--rent seekers, peonage contractors, rand other pillage troopers – have participated in this conspiracy with the courts, and, have even claimed that they wrote my court papers, so they have stakes in the matter. But I appear in proper person and I do not know these people. So, I advise the committee to be on the ‘look-out’ for these illegal encroachers and impostors for they are the link to the next stage of the case: the fraud in my immigration records, which I will soon bring to this committee. I am filing a complaint for fraud with the 'Office of Professional Responsibility' concerning the obstructions and forgery in my immigration case. Soon, however, I would have to bring the matter to this committee, because, 'politics' have taken over the matter. Besides that, the obstructionists continue to pose a threat to my life and they are the reason why I believe that 'special circumstances' rules must be invoked to deal with this matter. I look forward to hearing from you soon.
Sincerely,
Ohene Boakye-Yiadom
