US Targeting Ghanaian With Gay Immersion Has Midas Syndrome-2

In PART 1 of this publication titled, US Targeting of Ghanaian With Gay Immersion Has Midas Syndrome-1 and published at www.ohenespointe.com,  I explained how Canadians and Americans created a hate crime they named PROGRAM, and,  imposed this on me to ensure my ruination. The program has run for decades and devastated me, albeit, utterly destroyed me. Still, nobody has been apprehended for such reckless violations; the crime continues and so does the excitement Americans get from it. The program has several components, among which are the gay immersion and sex change re-runs now centered in San Francisco and managed by US intelligence agencies. Of course, where else would a gay touch mud-sling take a stronger hold?

The crime's strategy is to frame every one of my activities as homosexual, because, the American architects and experts of the gay immersion social engineering program believed that merely repeating and throwing the gay frame epithets and slogans at me would,  eventually,  make me homosexual, even if drugs and social manipulations fail to achieve the desired results. Why should I blame American experts who make their living making up facts to get the budget they need from political and cultural leaders who sponsor such hate activities? The US leadership apparently supports this hate crime, because, the principal conspirators are American citizens and surrogates for the leadership. [I remind the readership that in this case, leadership, does always mean what you think it must].

 In particular, in San Francisco, where the general public has demonstrated absolute gullibility and vulnerability to lies fed to them by the power structure,  where anti-immigrant vibes are silent, but, virulently dispersed through ethnic groups, and, where support for this hate crime is overwhelming, the public hears every word I utter, and every move I make as program-directed, and hence,  gay immersed. In Midas terminology, I have the Gay Touch or Gay Curse.

In other parts of the world, people ordinarily take baths and showers. In San Francisco, only gays do!  In this city, all I have to do is to talk to a male individual and the alarms bells would ring! Even if my brothers, nephews and friends call me from Ghana, Americans are told that the program is working, because, "He is socializing with men." Of course, these are examples on the lighter side of things that you cannot take for granted in San Francisco. In this victimizing program, the leadership creates language and meaning relying on what I consider to be straw man technique and rationality, the driving force for social interaction, deception, branding and control in this program of violations.

Thus, fallacy and misrepresentation adopted by the conspirators illustrates the impunity and fraud with which defamation associated with the program has been implemented against me. US legal authorities surprisingly look the other way; or they hide behind codes, the public and innuendo to spearhead this crime. In a sense, the city and the program have their own identity, and, this identity has compromised morality to the extent that even a crime such as Americans attacking and destroying an international student, because, he has the potential to succeed, is heralded as heroic, patriotic and civilized. Victim blaming litanies, such as, "Why did you come here?" "Didn't Ehai say do not come here?"  have blinded the general public to the reality of this egregious violation and dastard dehumanization. What happened to the constitutional society and international standards?

 Whether it is death, crime,  sex or sin city, San Francisco has shaken my trust in the American system. I have been flummoxed by the resounding support for this hate crime and reckless violation of my human rights in San Francisco. Even immigrant groups have embraced this band-aid for a homosexual beneficiary, and, they support a program based on hatred for my origins, and,  disdain for my beliefs in traditional morality. The homosexual or bisexual beneficiary of these crimes is a hero among Asian and Latino groups in San Francisco to the extent that they see me as a nuisance and an enemy, just as the programmers want it. I am  aghast that these people cannot see through  the official deceptions and cover ups of the crime and crime architects [including the white homosexual] who go by popular code-names, which include  YOUR, YU, EYE, GUISE, HERE, THIS, etc.

Perhaps, Americans, simply out of hatred, enjoy seeing an African immigrant destroyed in true form [this is neither video nor movie], and then, feel proud about it,  as if it took place in an arcade game. What of these immigrant groups? If I have found one truism in this, then, it is that many Americans embrace the homosexual component of the conspiracy,  because, the American political culture (itself) has amazingly succumbed to this questionable moral phenomenon. Immigrants usually simply follow citizens to advance hatred just so they could get a piece of the pie. This seems to have created a morality crisis in individuals, groups and communities in United States. Moreover, the crisis appears to have swept over individual sovereignty and the constitutional right of an individual not to be bothered with 'something,' even if ninety-nine point nine percent of the people embrace 'that something'.[Ref. John S. Mill in On Liberty].

Currently in United States, even those who do not believe that sodomy is a natural right may have accepted the rationale of eugenics adherents who view homosexuality as a natural population control strategy against disliked immigrants of my ilk [And I do not enjoy beating myself down]. Elimination is what eugenics is about. Just fancy this: Thus far, I have not found a lawyer or human rights organization in United States to assist me with this human rights crime, partly, because, lawyers and human rights outfits in US have now accepted the homosexual rationale, namely, it is a civil right. They also play the quid pro quo game on me, because, they have to support their own. The suggestion is this: If you want us to take your case, then, you have to embrace homosexuality [Cover up this!]. Of course, the demand of the programmers is that I MUST become homosexual or become nothing. As I understand it, these activities are financed  by tyrants and oligarchs like Bill Gates. What still bamboozles me

Still, many people who support the program against me are misled by gender or ethnic advocates who have sworn  to ruin me to cover up their own trade, contract assassinations, and, avoid accounting for the program. Unfortunately, well-meaning feminists have been confused to believe that they are waging war against a woman hater and one who picks on old ladies [That would be I], where they have been misled by politicians and political operatives who actively function as killers for money, and, who may be working for corporations and NGOs who pay them to eliminate so-called radicals and 'enemies of capitalism.'

If  feminists and NOW placed the gender issue upfront, and, all parties were openly allowed to present their versions of the facts, I am sure that majority of women would not support the cause on the feminist agenda against me. I will address the issue of the female professor who ignited the venom of North American feminists and homosexuals against me later. Suffice it, nevertheless, race, ethnicity, intolerance and ignorance have been fed into the matter, because, this is how these assassins and questionable experts operate. In San Francisco the source of hostility towards me from professionals is said to be one of the powerful politicians in the conspiracy. Lawyers, doctors, professors and others have sold their souls to this cruel individual in support of a hoax, a scam, an extortion, and a reckless act of dehumanization. This is not simply a moral issue; it is, indeed, a serious criminal conspiracy, so, US authorities must apprehend it as such.

Confusion in the political and cultural morality with regard to sodomy hardly implies that the gay issue is a done deal or settled in United States. Thus far, only about ten US states have laws legalizing gay relations. In in liberal California, the people rejected the proposal in a referendum. That case is now with the US Supreme Court.  The problem I have with  these lawyers, human rights organizations,  and of course, politicians promoting the program is why do Americans have the right to impose homosexuality on me, if even among Americans the issue is not resolved? Why have Americans made homosexuality quid pro quo for my existence, if,  in fact, individual rights are the foundation for homosexual agitation; where, life, liberty and pursuit of happiness still remain  building blocks of the US Constitution? Why should Americans associate everything I do with homosexuality, when I find such linkage offensive, injurious, defamatory, and, indeed, a violation of my human rights?

So,  I likened my persecution to the Midas dilemma. If Midas had the golden touch syndrome, then, in this case, I have the gay touch syndrome. Where Midas had the curse of gold, I have the gay curse. But, unlike Midas, I did not ask for it. It was thrown at me as an act of revenge and punishment with intent to embarrass and humiliate me for several reasons. I did not ask for a homosexual date let alone the one foreigners have imposed on my head in United States. This is why I need an explanation from the US government as to why it has the right to invade me with demonic powers and impose a ruination program on me. Why has US fixed me with the gay curse?

Although it is impossible for me to adequately compare my case to that of King Midas, because of the many versions of the former, and, because, the latter is not a myth, I hope that this analogy would help inform the rest of the world [or whosoever reads this piece] of the curse known as homosexuality in United States to which I am now enslaved for aspiring to succeed in North America, for attempting to actualize my potential, for pursing economic independence, for celebrating choice making and upholding liberty in pursuit of a life of happiness. America has punished me for succeeding and for asserting my individuality, and, threatens me with more violence, if I contemplate further academic pursuits, or, dating women. Of course, I have already suffered a tragic consequence of the program, namely, end stage kidney failure! What do you call this: Hatred or punishment?

I was an eager international student, ever grateful for the opportunities given me via scholarships to improve my lot and that of my relatives in Ghana. The enemy turned the scholarships into debentures, because, "the money was taxpayers' money." But, this was not wholly true, because, my initial scholarship was neither governmental nor institutional. It came from a privately created fund to which willing individuals voluntarily contributed. It had nothing to do with United States Aid [USAID] or scholarships given by the Gates, Rockefeller of Ford Foundations. So, how come American attacked me for something awarded me in or by Canadian private sponsors?

But envy, jealousy and hatred nurtured and transported by those supremacy-minded Americans hunted me down for the kill, because, "He does not deserve the opportunity. What of those born here?"  The interference and ruination of my dream by Americana is named program, as if to say that makes it legal and constitutional. It continues now, because, those who created the hate program are American leaders and experts, who as you know, must not fail. They must prove their theories of the black man's inferiority, because, this is about the fate of the race.This is why racists are bragging about that they have captured me, or, I have surrendered.

Is it surprising that in San Francisco a cabal of experts and professionals are said to be behind any mayhem or mistreatment meted to me? To be specific, at SFGH and UCSF Medical Center, professors are profusely mentioned anytime people set eyes on me in these locations, as if to remind me that the source of this Midas calamity was the elites of this society, and, not the bombs of the streets or witches of my family in Ghana. This is why I will use the rest of the publication to explain some of the professor-professional connection to the case while sublimely posing the question, whither professional codes of conduct? It is unsavory. So, reader, please, be advised.

I am now aware that even students I taught in Ghana and Nigeria in the 1970s and 80s read my sites. Some of them have joined me at facebook [nanaboakyeyiadom@facbook.com].  What a great reward for a teacher! They would like to know what happened to their teacher in North America. This is one reason why I split the bean wide and deep, even though some of the detail herein recounted is unsavory. Another reason is that American leaders--politicians and intelligence-- and Black Americans are strenuously feeding Ghanaian leaders with misinformation about the program to the extent of mudslinging me as a CRIMINAL in Ghana. In the minds of my friends in Ghana, I am a criminal under investigation in United States. Meanwhile, the program continues. As you know, I must become homosexual or become nothing. Of course, with these exposures, I do not have to stretch your imagination that I face multiple death sentences from secret courts in United States. This is why the savory and the unsavory must be spelled.

Imagine you are an African student[a visa student] confronted with the decision to reject romantic advances from a professor on your advisory committee[for reasons you best know], who, needless to say, threatens to wreck your studies, academic goals and life,  if you do not concede. She is not punished for professional infidelity and misconduct for breaching her fiduciary duty, let alone for the threats of violence and mayhem . Instead, the university hires a lawyer, albeit, a Queen's Counsel [QC] to come after you. He sets a continental attorney hostility in motion. Then, he reaches out to hospitals to seek help to destroy you , and, then,  writes to tell you to attend hospitals, because, you are sick. The opposing attorney now wants to be your adviser. Doctors and hospitals have always been part of the program. We have the professional conspiracy in place to reinforce a pre-existing eugenics program. It is clinical warfare galore in every sphere of the practice.

 Her gender and colleagues already in a fraternal collision named NOW begin reprisals and attacks against you on the continent with help and support from the US government, leftist [radical, sometimes, progressive] organizations and a myriad of demonic drone attacks to which you hardly have defenses. They rein in the homosexual frame to defame you to cover up the shortcomings of their colleague. The demonic magic common in the race  is resourced out to the public to use against you as if you are now game. Other races and tribes are instigated to use their own resources--spiritual and secular--against you. Your own government stands aloof far away in Africa believing that, indeed, you are a criminal, because, US officials say so. For them, making you an international fugitive would be safer than simply requesting US to stop and investigate this case. Subjected to continuous demonic torture, you end up in San Francisco, homeless, shackled, hospitalized, traumatized,  harassed, framed, discriminated against, abandoned and yet threatened with elimination. For some reason, the American public heartily supports this degrading gaming.

Why did they do it? Why did feminist, professors, lawyers, doctors or professionals attack this African student, when he was the one who was solicited by a supervisor? The simplest answer, thus far, given is that, otherwise, the student [I] would destroy the professor's career. The truth remains that it was the professor herself and her colleagues [and surrogates from United States] who spread the details of this matter beyond  the primary characters in the case. Even when the professor made life most difficult for the student when he was writing his Research Paper, he never concluded that she was in revenge against him for not responding positively to her advances.The student was already a target of US intelligence, African Americans, NGOS and multinationals and contract assassins.

Many feminists well know that the issue of sexuality in the work place is about power relations, where the fear is that one party [the more powerful] may aptly victimize the other party [the less powerful], if the former is rejected. The primary reason why romantic relations are outlawed between bosses and subordinates is that some people are simply emotionally immature, and so, they cannot maturely handle rejection. When such superiors are rejected by underlings, the former usually would victimize the latter. Not only did I study this phenomenon in teachers' college, but, also, I witnessed this happen in several instances as a teacher. This was what happened. Thus, feminist contention that I would have destroyed the professor's career holds no water [it smacks Aunt Sally], because, as an independent African student [ I was not government or institution sponsored], I was in a vulnerable position vis-a-vis a radical feminist professor from North America, and, hence, I would have been the last one to contemplate exploiting that issue to destroy the professor.

Indeed, in this case, I was in the less powerful position, and, I was the last person to divulge the open secret. So what gave cause to the fear that I would destroy the professor's career, and so, professors, lawyers and doctors the world over should be organized against me? Does this illustrate racial intolerance or professional arrogance? Does this not fit the analogy of bringing a gun to kill a fly? So should one woman's sexual indiscipline end up in ruining all my life? Why? The point is that there was more to it than the eye could see, as I would illustrate in future publications. Now this candid observation:

Let us suppose it that the facts of this case were reversed, and, I was the professor [African] who proposed to a Canadian girl [white] who was under my supervision, and, she declined. Let us then suppose that I declared that, 'I would not take "No," for an answer,' and then, I resolved that the Canadian lady would not advance her career until she surrendered to me. Then, I declared social and demonic warfare against her. Would my professional colleagues and males in North American join me in fraternity to hunt this lady down in the assumption that, otherwise, she would destroy my career ? Do you see Aunt Sally?

Would the university hire a lawyer to hire assassins to go after the lady so that I could have and protect my career? Would the lady be declared a wet blanket and lesbian on the continent for refusing to date one man from Africa? I believe that the whole continent would help me with demonic attacks, torture and harassment to discredit, defame and dehumanize that lady. Do you not think so?

Feminists enjoined the gay immersion program and persecution as reprisal and punishment in support of that professor who must not take a "no" for an answer. So NOW [also [WON as coded in this crime] must join the conspiracy in full scale and instigate obstructions, misinformation, violence and death threats against me. Still, underneath that was the agenda for the pre-existing program, a component of which was and remains gay immersion and sex change to which I must be accursed.

If I would not date that woman, then, it means I hate women, in particular, old women. So all women should reject me and hate me, particularly, old women. Moreover, I should be forced to embrace homosexuality and become gay, because, I hate women. The hypocrisy of NOW exposed is that any man in the professors's position would have been charged with sexual harassment. I cannot even imagine what would happen to an African male professor doing same to a white lady student in North America and still being alive. Still, zealots of this conspiracy have ordered violence against me in San Francisco with intent to bully and intimidate me to submit to the voyeurism and other deviant lifestyles the case embodies without the slightest regard for my human rights.

Voyeurism entered this program when a Theology Professor from my undergraduate university, where the program began,  masked his identity and appeared as a doctor at the University of Waterloo Infirmary [Canada] to conduct a physical examination on me in the fall of 1985. Since then, the conspirators have followed me to my bedrooms and bathrooms to catch a glimpse, not merely of my body, but also, of any sexual encounters in which they suspect that I may be involved. In San Francisco, authorities and politicians have never lost the opportunity to take pictures of me or even make videos of me, whenever they believed that I was naked. They would then publicize their catch to the public. Where the intent is to embarrass me, the conspirators have revealed themselves to be people who hate.

I know this, because,  the public would then talk back to me about it, scorn and make fun of me in provocative ways about the lies just sold to them by their own authorities. In San Francisco, authorities have to ensure that I never get to date a woman, because, I am prohibited; banned from relations with women as required by eugenics and the punishment prescription. "He must use the men." This ban is the program, the competition and the punishment. But, all told, is this legal and constitutional?

I have stood my ground, and, I would forever stand my ground against this 'tyranny of the majority' [Ref. Alexis d'Tocqueville in Democracy in America]. Needless to say, the misbehavior of that professor led to some of the gay framing against me, in particular. where white males and professors are concerned. I am sure that some of the frantic efforts  in San Francisco to cover this up is to protect these professors from punishment they deserve. But, who represents these professors in United States, and, specifically, San Francisco? It appears to me that there is more of racialism than professionalism to such representation, in particular, if such representatives are politicians. So why have US politicians taken up a fight with me in a case that happened between professors and me on university campuses in Canada, and, thereby, destroyed all of my life? Ironically, these would be classic cases of professorial abuse had the victim been a white man! This one has legal merit.

Recently in San Francisco, men, the police and gangs seem to have surged to the front of opposition lines in defense of America, and, to cover up the scandal known as program. This has intensified the acts of torture, harassment and gay framing against me, with wild stories of sexual encounters involving me circulating like wild fire in the West African grasslands during the harmattan season. These days, all I have to do to be gay in the minds of Americans is to talk to a man, especially, a white man. It does not matter whether the man is a nurse, doctor,  storekeeper, bus driver, a street dweller, sane, insane, etc.The conspirators need images in the camera to help them continue with the misrepresentation. Without such fallacy, America loses.

All what matters is some level of interaction with another man and I would be suddenly under demonic torture and harassment that usually targets my genitals as ordered by the program. The white man's fascination with the size and strength of my genitals goes back to the fall of 1985, as illustrated by the disguised physician examination by that Theology Professor. Ever since that time, the enemy has fueled his imagination to contort uncanny and wild stories about me, and,  as well,  fired up his envy and anger to think of me with a woman! Women who take this chance with me, particularly, young women, would risk visits from authorities or Black American gangs. They may also face isolation and other unknown punishment. This makes this case not simply racial, but, indeed, also, personal hatred.

Meanwhile, the public should scorn and tease me with how I have been starved with sex. They should remind me that if I make any attempt to date a woman I would either find myself on the cliff hanger,  or my neck in an encounter with the chain saw. It could also be bullets in my forehead, as the youngsters would always gesture when they meet me in the streets. In fact most of them believe that the only way I have getting out of San Francisco alive would be via a homosexual and homosexuality. So now it appears as if the experts, programmers and engineers need my help in order to prove their theory against me. Otherwise, then, I face wilder stories, intensified demonic and societal torture and multiple death sentences. This was what King Midas never faced.

And you have not heard the last word on this matter.

Ohene Boakye-Yiadom, author and publisher.

US Targeting Ghanaian With Gay Immersion Has Midas Syndrome-2