NOTE TO THE READER: Those suspicious of my claim of eugenics, torture and other experiments to destroy me must not forget that the United States did the 'Syphilis Deal." It took sixty-five years before President Clinton officially confirmed the rumor and apologized for the "Tuskegee Project" in which 399 Black American men used for that research withered away one by one. I will not wait for sixty-five years to get vindication and justice. Details of this 'crime against humanity' as committed against me would be the focus of my report Titled, "My Case against the United States." As I have indicated elsewhere, I will file the report with both the United States government and the United Nations. Other countries involved in this crime, most likely, Canada and my native Ghana, would be reported separately. The current letters are about one of the main violations, deprivation. By now, you might have realized that my belief [and, perhaps, yours] that the United States government, particularly, the Department of Justice and the Courts believe in the efficacy of the rule of law, the judicial process and individual rights [See Letter Seven] was misplaced. A number of reasons account for this. First, the ongoing advisement that I should be 'ignored' has been carried out to term. Second, there is a prevailing belief that the 'decision' on me 'has already been made.' In the minds of some of these bureaucrats and politicians, I have already been sentenced to death, so what does it matter, what case I win or lose? So, I have just informed you of my knowledge of the existence of an extrajudicial justice system in my case, a system that does not have to pronounce charges against me, a system that does not allow due process, because, it is a system that does not follow the same rules you and I are required to follow.In 'My Case against the United States,' I would provide details of the impact of these violations and justify my case for compensatory damages against the United States. For instance, as my peers are on six-figure salaries, I have been unlawfully held down in a program of experiments and dependency, until I become gay, a 'born again Christian,' and, a slave. I am fit only to receive welfare benefits. But, even that Black Avengers and self-styled patriots have to opposed it, because, it is taxpayers' money. I will be asking for full wages that I have lost in almost two decades as a result of being the subject of this nefarious program. As you and the cohorts enjoy life with your wives and husbands and made your lovable children, I have been held captive, because, the 'system' decided that I am unfit to sleep with women and reproduce, because, I am too dark, too ugly and too stupid for such a right. I am even sick, deficient: "You would be removed from the human gene pool," a jubilant enemy once whispered loudly to me. Thus targeted for lineage destruction, I have to be nurtured, inculcated, engineered, immersed and socialized into the culture of homosexuality. Women are banned from interacting with me. Any woman who dares love me would for certain be hurt. The call remains, "Don't love him."[You ought to believe that armed police and gangs are on hand to 'take care of me,' should I dare get close to a woman]. Condoleeza Rice, Nancy Pelosi and Barbara Boxer are policy overseers. They rely on their wicked and cruel San Francisco and Bay Area representatives to implement this policy. These include lawyers and pastors. So in the meaning of California's Human Rights Codes [Unhur], U.S. Tile 18 section 1091 et seq and allied United Nations Conventions or human rights laws, U.S. Amendment 8, Genocide and Wicked, Cruel and Inhuman crimes have been committed against me. Also ongoing are the enslavement education programs overseen by San Francisco and its cohorts, disregarding U.S. Amendment 13. When your classmates are professors, lawyers and senior policy officers and you are forced to be homeless, jobless and a subject of eugenics and enslavement programs, would you say that 'extraordinary circumstances' exist? Must those who did this pay for it? Would you say that the conspiracy by the United States government, African Americans, gays and feminists to make me a failure[for whatever reason] is anti-American?
I sent this letter to the Office of Professional Responsibility [OPR], the watchdog arm of the United States Department of Justice [USDOJ] in February of March 2006, after my frustration with the INS, US Courts, the Ombudsman, Department of Homeland Security, etc. The immediate trigger was refusal by Liguna Niguel to renew my EAD. I sent all the letters you have read and more that you have not read to the OPR, believing that a thorough investigation from within the DOJ was needed to correct all the impropriety and injustice done to me. Letters I sent as exhibits are listed at the end of this letter as 'enclosures.' When I was sure that the letter had been received, I called the ORP to discuss my case. A lady I talked with indicated receipt of the letter, and, indicated to me that it would take about six weeks to complete the investigations. She sent me a letter to that effect. After the expiry of six weeks, I called again to verify the status of my report. Again, that same lady told me that the lawyers were too busy, so I should call back in another six weeks. I did and she told me that my case had been looked into and a lawyer was preparing a letter to be sent to me, so I should have patience. I called again and again and again, before I realized that I was not going to get answered. Recently [after I started to publicize this case at this website], I received a letter from ANNIE WONG of the DOJ. She describes herself as "Program Analyst." I wrote to the OPR and I have a "program Analyst answer me? What Program? This letter almost repeated the words of the letter I received when I first made the report to the OPR, except it adds that there is no evidence that a court had made a finding of misconduct and that no extraordinary circumstances existed in this case. So if you are denied due process up to the U.S. Supreme Court, if extrajudicial elements issued decisions instead of Judges, if an individual's substantial rights are violated, if a manifest denial of justice is brought about through a conspiracy to deny an individual equal protection, if colorable violations form part of a conspiracy to violate an individual's human and civil rights, if an individual is subjected to eugenics and homosexual experiments, ethnic cleansing and enslavement education in United States, ritual abuse, torture, death threats; none of these constitute extraordinary circumstances. ANNIE WONG'S letter is published at the end of this letter. This would provide you, the reader, with a deeper insight into the fraud and corruption of which I speak. Soon, from my other website, ohenethinkslegal, you would read some of the extraordinary writs I filed and decisions on them. If your question is why the courts did not rule in my favor in any of the cases, then, the answer is that they were supposed to hold judgment for the 'slavery investors.' For Annie Wong, this would not be extraordinary. The drugging conspiracy to ‘slow him down or slow him’ that I have reported is not extraordinary conduct. If you are American, you have to be ashamed of this imprudent policy pursued by your government against me to appease African Americans. Whether you are American or not, I wish that you would understand this: The United States has no right to organize a competition for its ‘powerful women’ for the winner to enslave me. I am not African American and I would not be. The ‘feminist agenda’ against me sponsored by the U.S. Congress in this case would eventually be exposed. This is part of what this program is all about. Hence, Pelosi, Rice Boxer and the rest of them would soon be known as egregious human rights violators. Pelosi and Rice claim to have the right from dead people in my family to use witchcraft or voodoo to destroy me. This has also become U.S. policy. Please, wherever you are, demand an immediate investigation of this case, denounce the practice of U.S. sponsoring African Americans to kill, undermine and destroy Africans as an imprudent policy.
REPORT/COMPLAINT ABOUT CONSPIRACY AND FRAUD COMMITTED AGAINST OHENE BOAKYE-YIADOM.BY USCIS, AND, U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA AND U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT AND THEIR COHORTS.
________________________________________________________________________
AUTHOR: OHNE BOAKYE-YIADOM, 1230 MARKET STREET, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102.
RECIPIENT: H. MARSHALL JARRET, COUNSEL, OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY, DEPT. OF JUSTICE, 950 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, N.W. SUITE 3266, WASHINGTON, D.C. 20530.
FEBRUARY 7, 2007.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
INTRODUCTION:
For the past thirteen years, I have been the target of conspiracies, forgeries, criminal interferences and fraudulent activities involving governmental operatives [bureaucrats, law enforcement, politicians, medical officers, attorneys, USCIS in San Francisco and Laguna Niguel, the CIS Ombudsman and Director's office, etc.] aimed at destroying my life. These people, and organizations [governmental and non-governmental], along with ignoble politicians bent on riding on me to fame and fortune, and hate mongers from several ethnic groups, gays and feminists, etc., have operated in a chain conspiracy to invade my person and privacy, interfere with my official and private lives, deprive me of opportunity and benefit of the law, rob and burglarize me, drug and food poison me, indeed, undermine every effort in my life with the sole purpose of bringing me down as a failure. This chain conspiracy is in turn in support of a systemic persecutory program of biological warfare, eugenics, genocide and willful violation of my human rights, set up against me in Canada in 1985 and continued by the United States from the mid-1980s till now. The program aims at destabilizing my life, and, destroying my family and me. It was in fulfillment of this larger objective that FRAUD has played a major role since 1995. In particular, the impact of fraud and fraudulent activities with my CIS [INS] and my immigration records has caused me such irreparable damage and limited my life to that of an invalid that I have resolved on submitting this report to seek to bring the perpetrators to justice, before they kill me. This fraud has been extended to a Title Vii employment discrimination case, which I filed at the United States District court in San Francisco, which in turn, has severely endangered my life in San Francisco, because, political and crime lords have decided to steal the case, whether I like it or not for the benefit of some national figures. In this illegal and unconstitutional endeavor, these criminals found allies in the federal courts, and, have extensively used the FBI, CIA and other bureaucratic and police elements to track, torment and destabilize me. The Office of Professional Responsibility, is, therefore, most respectably requested to immediately investigate this matter in order to stop this parallel or underground system from making me their ultimate victim.
SCOPE
I have reported these illegal and unconstitutional activities to the U.S. Attorney-General's office, U.S. House Judiciary Committee, USCIS officials, including the Office of the Ombudsman and the Director, Board of Immigration Appeals, and Department of Homeland Security, Senate Committees on Judiciary, Foreign Relations, Intelligence and Ethics. I have also informed the office of the United States Attorney and the FBI in San Francisco many times, but, they chose not to act, because, some of these levels constitute nerve centers for this crime. This report, will, therefore be based mainly on these letters, copies of which are enclosed. With regard to the Title Vii complaint, I pursued legal action to the U.S. Supreme Court, but, fraudulent interference prevailed over the integrity of legal proceeding. It is now known to everybody in the Bay Area [if not throughout the country] that Senator Barbra Boxer has been the lead 'filibuster,' in this coldly-calculated interference, contempt of court and obstruction of justice to ruin my life. Others such as Secretary Rice, Speaker Pelosi, Senator Feinstein, former U.S. Senator Carole Morsey-Braun, a computer wiz from Microsoft called Cathy Marshall, Katherine Crier, etc. are said to be widely involved in this illegality. I will show how this helped to secure judgment for the defendants, CDS Leopold Group, likely contributor to Senators and Congresspeople from California [especially from the Bay Area]. These people believe in using 'raw power' and street logic to destroy me. So this is the second case for which I seek investigation. I believe that all the people involved in these cases must be investigated and those found to have violated the law should be punished, according to the Constitution, statutes and other laws of this country.
1.MY IMMIGRATION CASE AND FRAUD AT THE CIS[INS} IN SAN FRANCISCO, LAGUNA NIGUEL, AND, THE CLERK'S OFFICE AT THE BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS, LEESBURG, VA..
A.1 INTRODUCTION:
The issue here is that personnel from these departments and agencies, acting with their crime and political cohorts used fraud and intimidation to deny my political asylum application through the San Francisco Asylum Office. Then, they ensured that I was denied my request for withholding of deportation at the Immigration Court in San Francisco in a series of hearings presided over by a Judge Gonzalez. As recent as last year, they implored similar fraudulent and false entries in my record to deny me renewal of my Employment Authorization Card [EAD]. Without this EAD, I am unable to renew my California ID. I have no valid ID. This has happened, because, these people have divested me of the tangential legality I enjoyed, using the Immigration Service. In my line of suffering, INS was synonymous with HANNA STORM. Since 9/11, 'INS' has been synonymous with CONDOLEEZA RICE and CATHY MARSHALL of Microsoft.
A.2 MOTIVE
Although I believe that I am a target of FBI-CIA destabilization program, this ongoing interference was specifically because, perpetrators wanted to extort the processing fees of $175.00 for the EAD from me; they wanted to prevent me from looking for work so they could continue to keep me on General Assistance [G.A.] in San Francisco, etc. as part of an ongoing systemic seizure and torture program, etc. which San Francisco has hosted since 1996. They wished to DIVEST me of the tangential legality I enjoy in the country to prevent me from pursing my legal cases [including the Title Vii case mentioned above] in U.S. Courts. There has been talk of deporting me to ensure that people like Condoleeza Rice and Nancy Pelosi INHERIT whatever is due me in these cases. Thus, deportation, also, was to ensure that the government of Ghana would kill me. I had an application for SSI due to disability I suffered from a systemic-imposed torture and persecution program. Approval of this depends on maintaining my legal status in the country. 'Opposition' to this SSI has included the effort by some to divest me of my legal status. I have an ongoing civil rights case with the State of California and the City and County of San Francisco. I also intend to bring human rights' violation complaints against those who imposed the ongoing biological warfare program on me. Some of these people believe that if I am not a legal immigrant, then, I have no right to sue. The most important reason for this obstruction is that these people believe that I should not succeed. So they have to ensure that I do not become legal in this country, because, given my background, and potential, a full legal status would parachute me into success. Thus people like Mr. Willie Brown Jr. [former SF mayor], Ms. Kamala Harris, district attorney, Senator Boxer, and organizations such as Black Muslims, the KKKK, FBI, CIA and others mentioned or not mentioned as yet who appear to have been appointed by the 'system,' to oppress and persecute me, and, have their finger prints on these violations, for the motives stated. Now, I turn to specific issues in the immigration case and provide synopses that link up with the enclosed letters for full explanation. Although refusal of the Laguna Niguel Service Center to renew my EAD after I paid for it and after a year and half waiting, citing as their reason a purported decision on my asylum case by the Board of Immigration Appeals, is my most immediate concern, I would like to go through the whole asylum case to show why I strongly believe that FRAUD is at the core of all these decisions [See LETTER OR EXHIBIT 5].
I. THE POLITICAL ASYLUM CASE.
a. According to the political asylum office in San Francisco, the first reason why my application was rejected was that the INS issued me a VISITOR'S VISA for 180 days at New York IA in August 1994, and, I overstayed, and, applied for asylum. Thus, for the INS, this broke U.S. law. INS records indicate that I entered the country on December 12, 1994. [See, LETTER OR EXHIBIT 1].
PROBLEM: The problem with this charge as I explained to the Judge Gonzalez and the Board of Immigration Appeals was that I was never issued a VISITOR'S VISA for 180 days at 'NO NEW YORK IA.' Before I explain this, what is New York IA? I have never been there. I filed my asylum at the U.S. Embassy in Ottawa as a 'special case,' when it became obvious that my life was in danger, following exposure of a secret Canadian abusive biological warfare program against me, and, threats on my life by 'NOW Canada']. I learned that Black Muslim assassins had been invited to Canada to assassinate me. I was signaled by personnel at the U.S. embassy in Ottawa to enter U.S. territory and pursue my case, which they had forwarded to the Offices in St. Albans, Vermont, for processing. I entered U.S. territory at this time on February 20, 1995, through the border at 'Rouses Pointe-Blackpool' to the city of Plattsburg in Northern New York. I was picked up by a police officer from Plattsburg, who seconded me to the Social Services Dept. of the City that evening. The Social Services Dept. dispatched me three days later to Albany, claiming that they could not protect me, because of 'IT.' There records in Plattsburg, and, at the Rescue Mission in Albany, NY, Boston General Hospital, a homeless place in the City of Providence, RI, Wilmington, DE, etc. all the way to the Washington DC-Alexandria area, to Georgia, North and South Carolina and Florida, etc. to indicate that the INS charge against me was absolutely and totally fabricated. The Judge would hear nothing of it. If the Board of Immigration Appeals agreed with Judge Gonzalez, then, it too joined the 'FRAUD CHAIN.'
b. The other INS charge against me was that I did not apply to be an immigrant [ See LETTER OR EXHIBIT 1].
PROBLEM: If you follow the logic that I was given a visitor's visa and over-stayed, then, you would say that the INS was correct. But, if you look for the facts and realize that the INS claim was a falsity, then, you would conclude that the second charge against me was illogical, because, according to 8 CFR any applicant for political asylum is also considered automatically as an applicant to be an immigrant. I argued this out as much as I could, but, Judge Gonzalez ruled against me. Did the Board of Immigration Appeals review this case? [Read the charges at Ohenethinkslegal].
c. If the CIS says that I was accepted as a visitor ONLY at a New York IA, then, did the CIS or any of its affiliates have proof to support this claim? Judge Gonzalez asked the US attorney for the case THREE TIMES [Court Transcript and tapes should have this information]. Note: I reviewed the transcripts at the office of the Immigration Judge in 2007, and, this specific and very important inquiry by the Judge and the answer from the Attorney were not in the transcript. The work of the Congressional Committee on Immigration!
PROBLEM: The U.S. attorney was silent. She had no answer. When she realized that the judge was a bit furious over that matter, she answered the Judge's third repetition of the question with something to the phonetic effect of "THEY," "DEY," or "DAY.'' Then Judge Gonzalez responded, "The government has absolutely proved its case beyond all reasonable doubt." All this was TAPED!!. I have since learned that the U.S. attorney might have used a term from my native language, AKAN [spoken in West Africa, mostly in Ghana] to convey the notion of "RASH" or "RASHNESS," for which some of the leading people in the persecution against me are noted. The word would be "DEE"[literally 'rashes' that appear on humans]. This word and concept continue to be used by the general public to signify the same thing or person. Again, this was a clear indication of fraud or misrepresentation, which Judge Gonzalez should have debunked. Again, I explained this in my brief for review. Did the judge read it?
d. Another CIS/INS charge was that I was not invited by the INS or any U.S. organization to enter the United States as I claimed. They claimed that I overstayed my visa and then applied for asylum [See Ohenesthinkslegal for the letters of invitation].
PROBLEM FOR CIS: I provided two copies of letters written by the INS Asylum office in Vermont showing that I was invited to an INTERVIEW at the Buffalo Asylum Unit. The truth is that I never received those letters in Canada for any number of reasons. Also by the time of the interview, March 8, 1995 [or thereabout], I was already in U.S. territory, although, I had no idea about the letters. But, they were on my file transferred to New York, Buffalo, Arlington, Miami and New York. I succeeded in getting the file transferred to San Francisco through the help of a Polish lady called 'Maria,' who then worked with the International Rescue Mission in San Francisco. 'Maria,' almost lost her job, because, some people were unhappy that she helped me retrieve the file. [See, LETTERS OR EXHIBITS 2[A, B & C].
e. Due to the likelihood of fraudulent letters [Ex parte] against me and what would be their impact on my case, the INS refused me the right to review my own file [Although, I appeared in propria persona.' ' NOW,'(the feminist organization), San Francisco politicians, African-Americans and Canadians have been mentioned as among the authors of such letters].
PROBLEM UNSOLVED: Even though I went to the District Court to get access to my file on the basis of FOIA, I was given only partial copy of the file. The bizarre issue is that the INS had already asked me to pay for the photocopies, and, then, refused to copy the documents for me. This is similar to my EAD [as I explain soon] where I paid the processing fees and I was told after a year and half that 'you do not qualify, because, you were asked to leave in March 2003.'[Again, this misrepresentation must be unraveled, because, even the public is aware that the INS and the FBI are on these cases and illegal conduct. It appears as if the Board for Immigration Appeals is satisfied with this denial of due process and unconstitutional conduct. But, has there been fraud?
f. Applicable Law: My case took about three hearings to complete. Judge Gonzalez, convinced that I had a solid case of TORTURE, suspended the second hearing in or around May 1999[See March 22, 1999 issue of the Federal Registrar], to give me the chance to read about the new Torture Convention, which United States had recently signed, in order to use it as the basis for my claim against Canada.
PROBLEM: So, why did the judge rule as he did? Because letters were sent to him about me [wrongly accusing me of some crimes] and I was never given the chance of 'due process,' or, 'rebuttal.' This may include a false record created and imposed on me by the San Francisco Police Department. The report suggested that I was a violent person and a criminal [Also, U.S. enemy]. My case against the State of California and the City and County of San Francisco mentioned earlier was partly based on this false report against me. [The impact of this police frame up has been devastating].
g. Main Finding: Both the Asylum Unit and the Immigration Court,
[And the Board of Immigration Appeals, LETTER 5] agreed that I was firmly settled in Canada. This was not wholly true. Canada drove me out, because, it could not face having been caught as a human rights violator. It was like leave, or 'disappear.' I hear the same right now in San Francisco!! From gays, lawyers, law enforcement, IRA fanatics, politicians, etc [The reader is reminded that although Canada began the program, it is now continental. In fact, much of the torture, abuse and ritual violence, which pushed me out of Canada in 1995, appeared to have been staged by U.S. Intelligence and African Americans (with an alleged Congressional approval). This 'push him out and kill him factor' was "an invitation to trick or kill tactic" as I have described in several publications].
PROBLEM: This would mean that the U.S. embassy in Ottawa erred, when it accepted and processed my application. Presently in United States, the human rights abuse program began by Canada against me, has intensified four-fold. Americans are aware that this crime took place in Canada, that U.S. elements were invited or sent to Canada to attempt to kill me, or, to intensify the abuse. Presently, Canadian elements are right here in USA [Like an exchange program] to help U.S. continue what they [Canadians] began. Canadians believe I escaped exile, imprisonment and enslavement. Americans have made sure to institute same policy here against me, with overwhelming African American and minority support. I had a Masters Degree, but no job. I lived on G.A. and had no social or economic life, just as in San Francisco. If nothing happened, why did Canadian authorities offer to pay me compensation of $100, 000, which U.S. politicians and black Americans used as a factor to attempt to kill me, because, ' he does not deserve the money,' or 'Give the money to Nancy?' ' Repossess !!!,' Give the money to MEAN Or die !!! [How did Americans appear on the scene to compete for that money? You would know the answer if you read "My Case against the United States" to be published by September, 2008, unless the Office of the Solicitor General responds positively].
i. Transcripts and Tapes On the Case. When I filed for review of the case by the Board of Immigrations Appeals, I requested the San Francisco office of the Immigration Judge to provide me a copy of the transcripts and tapes from the hearings.
PROBLEM: I was told that all documentation on the case had been sent to Washington, D.C. But, does the Board of Immigration Appeals have the documents?
j. I filed for review in either November or December 1999. Years later, as I heard nothing from the Board, I wrote to both the Board and INS director's office to adjust my status to a Temporary Resident. I reminded the Board that I was never issued a "Withholding of Deportation Document,' even though the judge upheld [ruled in my favor] the aspect of my case against Ghana. Hon. Gonzalez actually tried to convince me to file the case against Ghana only.
PROBLEM: I heard nothing from the Board. In or about 2002 I phoned the Board to verify the status of the case and it appeared to me as if my file was nowhere to be found. Upholding the case against Ghana missed the point, because, Canada and United States committed the crime and fraudulently sought Ghana as partner.
During all this time, the INS in San Francisco kept misinforming the public that I came to this country illegally and had remained illegally, so I must be deported. This has irreparably complicated my life [Even after all these publications, the popular gossip around is the INS-inspired story that I came to this country as a tourist Nobody remembers that I arrived here in 1994 intent on enrolling in a doctoral program at UVA.I went back to Canada and returned as an asylee. For empirical evidence on the asylum issue, please, turn to Ohenethinkslegal].
k. Despite all this, I kept applying for renewal of my Employment Authorization Document each year under status code c(8), meaning my asylum case was pending, instead of 'c(10),' or, 'Withholding of Deportation']. This was a sort of LIMBO status intentionally given me, because, of the reasons offered under MOTIVE above. It is also feared that I would extricate myself from the 'forcible seizure and biological warfare-eugenics-homosexual, etc. experimental programs' unconstitutionally imposed on me, and as well, escape involuntary servitude, etc. [NOTE: If I have not indicated what the public in San Francisco believes was the ACTUAL reasons why my asylum application was denied, then, I hereby do so: 1. National Origins—I am from Ghana in West Africa. The ancestors from there sold African slaves whose descendants are today's African Americans. These people seek revenge against Africans. They received logistical support from bureaucrats, the police [SF] and minority politicians, including, for instance, Senator Boxer. Then, whites are said to have resolved with African American leaders that USA already has the required number [quota] of blacks, so Africans who are ‘blind-folded’ to enter should be wiped? [So why does the United States still include Africa in the 'green card lotteries?]. 2. I am adamantly heterosexual. I can tell you that right now in San Francisco, the orthodoxy is that until I become gay [any shade of], I could forget winning any of my cases or advancing myself. I am called upon to be 'open-minded,' and 'trusting.' A 'transgender' or male gay person has been nationally reserved for me, so I cannot fail USA. But, I would remain homeless until the enemies succeed in assassinating me [I do not have 'diamonds,' however]. Still, I do not know where in the U.S. Constitution, Statutes, Code of Federal Regulations, Bill of Rights, etc. these requirements are stated].Could the decision to ignore my complaints and deport me have come from gays? Politicians? Feminists? Congress? Or what has the government done about my sexual harassment, torture and persecution complaints? [ See Letters 7, 9 and D] .
PROBLEM: Because I failed to get jobs for the stated reasons, I became frustrated with renewing my EAD [I renewed it yearly since 1997]. So I stopped doing so in 2003. At this time I had a valid California ID, so I could not worry too much about not renewing the EAD. As evidence of my legal status, however, I needed to renew the EAD by last year in order to renew my California ID. Moreover, I need a real job in order to live humanly [Not on G.A]. I am desirous to extricate myself from the "programs," which put me on General Assistance and homelessness for the past eleven years, denigrating and dehumanizing a top scholar with two degrees. Color-wise? Origins? The Wart Syndrome? What?
l. So in 2005, I filed an application to renew my EAD [See Letter or Exhibit marked B]
PROBLEM: I was given the statutory 80-day limit to expect a response. But, at the end of this period, I heard nothing from the Service Center, Laguna Niguel, CA. I contacted them, and, I was issued a letter asking me to re-submit more photographs [ See, Letter or Exhibit C1]. I did. Then, I was given another eighty days to wait. After the expiration of this date, and, not having heard from Laguna Niguel, I contacted the office in San Francisco to get a Temporary Card. But, I was told that a MEMO had been placed in my records [Usual thing?] requesting me to provide 'EVIDENCE,' before the EAD could be renewed. San Francisco could not explain to me what 'evidence' was required. This sounded illogical to me, so I contacted the 800-Service line, they took a note from me and sent it to Laguna Niguel before I received a letter from Laguna Niguel on about February 15, 2006. Here is the full text of that letter:
"STATUS: Please, submit a clear photocopy of an appeal filed with the 9th District Court for evidence of your current status. Service records show that a Final Voluntary Departure Order was recorded or rendered on March 27, 2003, ordering the applicant to depart from the United States.
PHOTOS: Please submit two (2) photos according to the attached guidance." [See letter or Exhibit marked C2].
Basically, I was asked to submit another two photographs [bringing the total to six] and a copy of an alleged appeal I filed on the alleged decision rendered on case by the Board of Immigration Appeals at the '9th District of Appeals.' This sounded clearly fraudulent to me, because, no such decision had been rendered on my case, and, the court cited did not exactly exist. [Be reminded of my 'Visa at New York IA, and, you get the point of how these low lives doing this crime reason; deficiently]. The interferers took advantage of the fact that I stopped renewing my EAD in 2003 to enter the claim that a decision was rendered by the Board and I was asked to leave voluntarily. Angry, I responded to Laguna Niguel to point out the fraud [See letter 4]. I promptly reported the matter to the Ombudsman [Mr. Patri, Letter 6] at the CIS headquarters, the office of the Director of the CIS [Letter 7] and Secretary of Homeland Security [Letter 8]. Copies of all these letters are enclosed. The Ombudsman promised to handle the matter, but, towards the end of last year, it became clear to me that the Ombudsman's office had deceived me. I did not hear from either the office of the CIS Director or the Secretary for Homeland Security. After the Ombudsman's office failed me[See Letter 9], I called the 800-Service again to get an update on my case [By this time, I could not access my case on line with codes given by the CIS. The reason given was that too many people had called to inquire about my case so that a special lock had been placed on it to prevent even I from knowing what was going on]. The INS responded once again, claiming that I had given them the EVIDENCE they requested [I did not]. They indicated that I needed to send two more photographs [Letter 10]. So, I sent the photographs. Just before Christmas, they sent me a letter indicating that my application was denied, because, I was asked to leave the country on March 27, 2003 by the Board of Immigration Appeals.[See letter 4: If this was not an afterthought, then, why did Laguna Niguel not inform me for one and half years when kept asking me to send more photographs? One version of the story was that it was believed that I was not the one attempting to renew the EAD, because, I appeared different in the pictures. I wonder what they thought two decades of drugging abuse. Ritual violence and food poisoning and sleep deprivation would do]. Knowing that this was fraudulent, I decided to order a copy of the said decision from the Clerk's Office [Board of Immigration Appeals in Leesburg, VA]. Early in the NEW YEAR, 2007, I called the Clerk's office to inquire about my request. She was not sure that she received the request letter. But, she took my essential information and promised to look into the matter. A couple of days later, I received what was meant to be a copy of the said decision by the Board with my letter of request attached [Letter A]. Clearly, the forged decision had been sent from San Francisco and not from Washington, D.C. The city was agog with rumor and laughter about it, and, about how I 'have been targeted to be ELIMINATED here in San Francisco.' The saga continued when the letter was miraculously misplaced by an SSI worker at the San Francisco Dept. of Human Services who took the letter from me in the second week of January, 2007, to make copies for a stalled [obstructed] SSI case. He is also a lawyer.
M. Who did it?
ANSWER: Rumor is that gays and homosexuals are current and ongoing interferers and obstructionists in a chain of 'opposition" resistance to my presence in this country and on this earth, until I show them respect [Become one of them]. What is their problem? They want me to be tainted with their deviancy to obsfucate the genocide that has been committed against me. But they have always been the tools of the opposition against me. This opposition is led by Senator Barbra Boxer, Senator Feinstein, Rep.[Speaker] Pelosi, Secretary Condoleeza Rice, former Senator Carol Morsey-Braum of Illinois, former San Francisco mayor Willie Brown Jr., Cathy Marshall [ the popular computer wiz of Microsoft], Kamala Harris, current San Francisco District Attorney, Black Muslims, KKK, lawyers, U.S. and Canadian Intelligence organizations, a cross section of the public, etc. The only way to find out why these people have interfered in my life and obstructed all my efforts in both Canada and USA is to investigate this matter, catch these people and let them answer in a court of law.
n. Why is this matter one of urgency?
ANSWER: Presently, I have no valid ID Card. I need at least the EAD in order to renew my California ID or to get another State ID should I move. Then, people in this have committed serious crimes against me, apart from crimes against the state and humanity so, they must be brought to justice. Further, exposing this fraud would only be the first step in the effort to stop the chain conspiracy that also seeks to destroy my family and lineage in Ghana. It would expose the plot between the 'system' and African Americans to maim and malign Africans for revenge and greed purposes. Doing this would expose many high-ranking people in Canada and USA. I intend to apply to the 'witness protection program,' in the very near future, because of imminent danger I face. This is why the 'special circumstances clause,' must be invoked in this case.
B. THE TITLE VII EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION CASE
This was a Title Vii Employment discrimination, etc. case, which I filed at the U.S. District Court for Northern California, San Francisco in July 2001 against CDS Leopold Group of Fremont [formerly of San Carlos, CA], which has become the play ground for conspiracy, FRAUD, obstruction of justice, denial of due process and equal protection, and, of course, a manifest miscarriage of justice [See last decision rendered by the Ninth Circuit, a forged document written by non-judicial elements marked LETTER 12]. Culprits in this case are the judge who heard the case at the District Court, Hon. Martin J. Jenkins, the Chief Judge and Clerk of the Ninth Circuit, Morrison and Foerster, LLP of Palo Alto, attorneys of record for defendants/respondent, and, of course, the latter, CDS Leopold Group itself. There appears to have been extrajudicial cohorts in this crime, most probably political leaders, vigilantes and self-styled patriots from San Francisco, plus, the same line up of violators in the immigration case discussed above. Of course, in an expanded report I would show that the field of rent seekers, insurance contractors and peonage adherents has expanded in the Bay Area. [They are now called investors by the media, confident that I have been 'taken and possessed by the sole Super Power in the World' to be plundered at will without response].
I have exhausted all appropriate legal means to seek redress [ I have gone all the way to the United States Supreme Court], but, the corruption is so huge that perpetrators have been able to stop the case at the Clerk's office [This is also to prove to me the nature of their 'power']. The chief filibuster is openly known to be Senator Barbra Boxer of California [An individual among many who may have been part of a plot to kill me since the 1980s when I was a student in Canada, because, for them, I had 'undeserved potential,' given my ethnicity and national origins]. So, you would not be wrong to say that my report for impeachment of Judge Jenkins to the House Judiciary Committee could be a joke. The committee claims that the documents are 'missing,' in the mace of 'change-over,' so I need to re-submit them. I submitted separate copies to then the committee chairman, Congressman Sensenbrenner, The Senate Judiciary Committee and the Chairman Senator Arlen Specter, etc. I have also contacted Congressman Tom Lantos of the House Human Rights Caucus [District 12, Representative from District 8 where I reside may be involved in this conspiracy], in my effort for a reasonable resolution of the matter. Thus far, I have zero responses.
As far back as 2002, when fraud and willful intent to deny me justice became apparent in this case, I reported the matter to the FBI in San Francisco. But, they did nothing about it. Instead, they are rumored to be using criminal and street people to chase after me, and, destabilize my life. They are said to be one of the sources of society-wide massive drugging attacks and interferences to which I have increasing been subjected. They are also in league with gays and other defunct paramilitary groups [imported and domesticated] that see it as their duty to 'keep me in line.' Around September 2006, the same time I sent the matter to the House Judiciary Committee, I contacted the office of the U.S. Attorney in San Francisco [See letter marked 13], I followed this with phone calls to Mr. Owens [Special Assistant to the U.S. Attorney], and Mr. Kevin Ryan [U.S. Attorney], but, I got none of them to speak with and I never heard from them. In fact, it is possible that some personnel from the Dept. of Justice, San Francisco, misrepresented themselves as employees for Morrison and Foerster, LLP to seek to oppress me during the trials in this Title Vii case. At least, one of them, Mr. Kevin Mulcahy, Bar No: ……[the lead attorney] turned out as Assistant U.S. attorney stationed somewhere in Southern California, as far back as early 2002 [Soon after he appeared in court on March 19, 2001 and absconded]. The rest were Ms. Elaine Gonzales, Bar No……., Mr. Daniel Waldman, Bar No: ……and Mr. Raymond Wheeler, Bar …….[I have court records listing these details about these individuals]. Denial of justice and fraud herein stated may have been purposeful oppression by state functionaries and politicians. Presently, I am turning the case into a Civil Rights case [sections 1981 and 1985, etc., of Title 42]. Still, I believe that unpardonable crimes and unconstitutional conduct took place which must be dealt with, because, they violated the U.S. and California Constitutions and violated my civil rights. This letter is to explore the possibility that your office would take up the case before I send the papers work on it. This fraud must be investigated and punished. The seriousness of this case and urgency of this request reflect the fact that perpetrators in this case intentionally and willfully took this illegal and unconstitutional action as part of a systemic program of abuse, torture and persecution targeting me for reasons of national origins and other immutable factors, belief that I am a slave and stupid African to be taken advantage of, the amount involved, etc. Fortunately, the file contains information, which convincingly supports my case. I have deliberately enclosed the last 'order' on the case that I received from the Ninth Circuit, the nerve center of this fraud. This is marked Appendix AA. This tip of the iceberg should offer you an insight into the nature of the fraudulent activity of this case undertaken by the Clerk's office at the Ninth Circuit. I will therefore be glad, if the Office for Professional Responsibility would respond favorably.
CONCLUSION OF THIS LETTER
These two cases of fraud and conspiracy form part of the chain conspiracy program to seize, torture and violate me with expectation that NOTHING will happen to the perpetrators. But, I am prepared to take these cases and the general case of abuse and persecution to the highest courts in the world for justice, because chief tortfeasors and custodians of this country's laws are among these human rights abusers. I strongly believe in the axiom that 'nobody is above the law.' I state thus not to blackmail authorities of this country, but, indeed, to indicate that their indifference, inaction and silence to my pleading for the last thirteen years in this country have served to strengthen me against all those they seek to protect, or, seek to use to destroy me. The 'DAMAGE has been done,' but there is still time for authorities of this country to do what they have failed to do: Admit their fault and stop this crime so that I would have a life. This Office of Professional Responsibility would be playing a major role in how the pieces of this case would be glued. As I write to you, I have no valid ID. The INS has joined forces with my enemies to DIVEST me of legality in this country. Please, help me to unravel this plot, first, by investigating the case of the Employment Authorization Card [EAD], because, the same people have been involved in these illegal activities against me. Worse still, they have me on all 'assassination and death lists' in North America. Something is wrong here. Please, help me find out what something is wrong. You can begin with EAD and then the Asylum case.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Ohene Boakye-Yiadom.
ENCLOSURES:
1. Letter 1: Reflects INS decision on my political asylum application and charges filed against me before the Immigration Court in San Francisco. Please, examine this key document very well.
2. INS maintains that I did not file for political asylum at the U.S. Embassy in Canada, and, that, I was never invited to this country for asylum interview. Letters 2(A), 2(B) and 2(C), all obtained from my file with the Service tell quite the contrary story. Letters 1 and 2 tell of the injustice, fraud and conspiracy I have encountered.
3. Letter 3: Copy of Letter I sent to the Service Center at Laguna Niguel following the beginning of the impasse concerning renewal of my employment authorization.
4. Letter 4A and 4B: Reflect Board of Immigration Appeal Decision sent to me recently. The decision was allegedly on March 27, 2003. Based on the factness of Letters 1 and 2 alone, I believe that this decision was fraudulent. Otherwise, it was wrong, and, I deserve a review.
5. Letter 5: Decision of Hon. Alberto E. Gonzalez, the Mexican-born Immigration Judge who heard my case. This decision was based on Letter 1 and 2 that clearly appear to be fraudulent.
6. Letter 6: Letter to authorities following discovery of deportation 'memo' in my CIS records.
7. Letter 7: Reflects one of the many letters I sent to the Director of USCIS following discovery o the said deportation memo.
8. Letter 8: A copy of letters described in 6 and 7 to the Secretary of Homeland Security, Hon. Micheal Chertoff. Letter 8(B) reflects letter I sent to the Board of Immigration Appeals, but, copied to the Director of Homeland Security.
9. Letter 9: Disappointing response from the office of the ombudsman, after a year of promises. Not included.
10. Letter 10 [behind C2]: USCIS last correspondence regarding EVIDENCE of my legality.
11. Letter 11: Letter to the Solicitor-General of the United States requesting Amicus Curae for the troubled Title Vii complaint. No response.
12. Letter 12: Last decision by the Ninth Circuit on my Title Case.
13. Letter 13: Letter to the U.S. House Judiciary Committee requesting "oversight' or impeachment of Hon. Martin Jenkins who heard the Title Vii case.
14. Letter 14A: Copy of sent to the Attorney General of the United States and 14B reflects one of the many letters I sent to the FBI in San Francisco on the matter. No response.
15. Letter 15: Reflects letter dated September 25. 2006 I sent to the Office of United States Attorney in San Francisco requesting an intervention in these conspiracies and fraudulent violations. No response.
16. Letter A: Reflects Decision of the Laguna Niguel Service Center on my EAD renewal application. This decision was based on Letters 1, 2, 4 and 5, and, therefore, must either be fraudulent or unjust.
17. Letter B: Reflects my initial application to renew my EAD.
18. Letter C1: Reflects Laguna Niguel's for "Evidence." The fact that Laguna Niguel wrote my name as 'Ohene Boakye,' instead of Ohene Boakye-Yiadom, meant that they were dealing with the network of those who have sworn to use identity fraud to disrupt my life. Soon after this, someone called Laguna Niguel to change my records, including my mailing address.
19. Letter C2: This reflects the full 'prose' of the request for Evidence made by Laguna Niguel. Please, notice that Laguna Niguel did not even know the nature of court Structure in the federal judiciary system. This was the work of an amateur criminal and the OPF must catch this person.
20. Letter D: This is a copy of one of the letters sent to the DOJ on this matter. This was sent to the Assistant Attorney-General for Criminal matters.
Below, please, find what is supposed to be the OPR’s response to the letter you just read. If you believe as I do that United States authorities have a responsibility to ensure that trust and confidence reposed in the principles and institutions that constitute the foundation of this country must be safeguarded against conspiracies, abuse of power, injustice, fraudulent and corruptive practices, then, please, raise your voice in protest with me to demand an investigation of this case. There will be more of these publications soon to prove my case beyond the reasonable doubt. Thank you. oby.
U.S. Department of Justice
Office of Professional Responsibility
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W., Room 3266
Washington, B.C. 20530
APR 1 1 2008
Ohene Boakye-Yiadom
1230 Market St.
San Francisco, CA 94102
Dear Mr. Boakye-Yiadom:
This is in response to your correspondence to the Office of Professional Responsibility
(OPR), dated February 7,2007, in which you alleged misconduct by an Immigration Judge and other
Department of Justice attorneys in connection with your removal proceedings.
OPR has jurisdiction to investigate allegations of misconduct involving Department of
Justice (DOJ) attorneys that relate to the exercise of their authority to investigate, litigate or provide
legal advice, as well as allegations of misconduct by law enforcement personnel when they are
related to allegations of attorney misconduct within the jurisdiction of OPR. OPR also has
jurisdiction over immigration judges, who are DOJ attorneys. It is, however, the policy of this Office
to refrain from investigating issues or allegations that could have been or still maybe addressed in
the course of litigation, unless a court has made a specific finding of misconduct by a DOJ attorney
or law enforcement agent or there are present other extraordinary circumstances. Based on our
review of your correspondence, we have determined that your allegations fall into this category, there
is no evidence that the court has made a finding of misconduct, and there are no other extraordinary
circumstances present. Accordingly, we concluded that no action by this Office is warranted.
You may wish to seek the advice of your counsel or the Legal Aid Society with regard to your
concerns. We regret that we are unable to be of further assistance to you in this matter.
Sincerely,
Annie Wong
Program Analyst
