HOW UNITED NATIONS HAS HELPED UNITED STATES TO COMMIT
HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS
What happens to a bad behavior that is not punished? It gets repeated ad infinitium, right? What happens when a father tells his bully son not to worry about his bad behavior, because, "my children cannot be charged with criminal violations?" The one issue I have with "Born Again" Christian theology is NOT the self-assurance that Jesus died for those who have accepted him as Lord and Savior, but, the extended interpretation that the so-called saved believers could go on and sin whenever they like, axiomatically believing that they had been forgiven even before they sinned, because, they were already saved through the sacrifice of the Christ. This same defective logic is practiced at the United Nations, particularly, by the United Nations Human Rights Commission and the elsewhere United Nations High Commission for Human Rights with regard to human rights violations in the West. This is the reason why the US has adamantly committed human rights violations against me for over twenty five years and sees no reason why it should stop. This is one of the reasons why at times when western observers frustrated with the UN's workings are wrong when they pontificate that the UN is dominated by the interests of developing nations.
The principle at the United Nations concerning human rights violations and Western countries is that Western countries cannot be charged with human rights violations, because, 'Western countries do no have RECORDS of human rights violations against THEIR OWN PEOPLE.' I have paraphrased the principle for this purpose. I could not believe my ears when UN human rights commission officials from Geneva and Washington, DC uttered these words of bias and favoritism to me for countries that claim to be at the forefront of the fight to guarantee and protect human rights. The official in Geneva further stated, "You would find it difficult to prove your case against either Canada or United States." This was in 1977. I never heard from Geneva again. Both John Neff and Immanuel Wallerstein have rightly surmised that in some Western countries, the devil is always believed to be in a foreign land. And so are human rights violators. Nancy Pelosi and alleged sustained critic of human rights violations in China and in whose district I am illegally seized and confined is als the guru of this program of violations.
Now, I understand why in United States, human rights issues are deemed foreign issues, namely, these barbaric violations do not take place in United States. In fact, a cursory glance through the HOT LISTS of US Congress men and women would yield empirical results in support of this view. This is what you would find if you undertook this simple and yet revealing experiment: Almost every Senator and House Representative has ANIMAL RIGHTS on his or her HOT LIST, but, less than TEN in both houses have HUMAN RIGHTS on their hot list. A hot list is a catalog of items, issues and topics that are presumably dear to the heart of the Senator or Representative. What story does that tell the solitary observer? Human rights violations, not in our neck of the woods! Those who know about the fate of Africans in United States in general, and my case in particular, however, would tell you that United States is full of human rights violations, and the world would be a better place, if UN human rights agencies would see to vigorously police United States and nations with similar privileges about human rights standards.
In San Francisco, where I have been forcibly confined since 1996, the people are focused not merely in immersing me in the deviant gay lifestyle, but, to even ensure that I would not to able to get an erection, let alone ejaculate. The public admonition "emma" or "don't come," is routinely shouted to me by adults and children alike, amidst simultaneous attacks targeting my genitals. "Emma," which means "don't come," is culled from the "Akan" language of Ghana. This may be too graphic and derogatory for digestion here, but, it is the fact, and so is the crime. At the same time, the public call on me to be in the mood to have sex with men just as female dogs do before the males have sex with them. Again, they use Akan words, "waso" meaning 'you are in the mood,' and 'so,' 'be in the mood,' to convey to me that the program to castrate me and immerse me into homosexuality has succeeded. Some of these Americans even tease that I am impotent and cannot have an erection. Others contemplate when I would have the operation to complete the process of change to become female. I am therefore the living evidence, the record on this crime against me.
If I do not get these messages, then, San Francisco would send 'young men' after me to throng around me and simulate the act of having sex to me. I was supposed to be given lessons on how to have sex by Black Americans, prostitutes and gays. But since I avoid them, the conspirators would send them to me. The public often deride, "embarrassing, is it not?" Meanwhile, San Francisco General Hospital and drugs manufacturers [the sponsors of the crime] continue to peddle the drugs for castration and mental attenuation to deepen the damage. Now , you tell me, is this a crime, a violation of my human rights? The people doing this know that what they are doing is a violation. What are we told about homosexuality not being a deviant lifestyle, if you have programs to deliberately effect and institutionalize the behavior? Is there a place where programs are run like the one I have experienced to induce heterosexuality in United States? Show me that place!
How do you suggest to me that such a treatment does not constitute a violation of my human rights? I sit because you do not deem me to be human? Now, let me attempt to take apart the UN contention to expose the fallacy of reasoning it embodies and expose the hypocrisy and the privilege offered US and similar countries to get away with human rights violations.
1. As a general observation, I would like to remind the UN that the Nuremberg Convention which formed the basis of the Convention Against the Crime of Genocide and Other Cruel, Wicked and Inhuman treatment or Punishment was established long before many countries in the developing world came into being. Activities such as using human beings for experiments did not exist then in the Third World. Even currently, apart from countries such as South Korea whose phenomenal economic rise has enabled them join areas as stem cell research, experiments oh human in the Third World is still practically non-existent. Apparently, therefore, Western countries were the target of both the Nuremberg Convention and the UN Convention Against the Crime of Genocide. This would mean that such activities, which were deemed to be human rights violations took mainly place in Western countries. United States, for instance, is on record for having pursued a policy of forced castration, for instance, as part of its eugenics and social Darwinist policies in the 1930s. Is eugenics or its antecedent forced castration a human rights violation? This policy still continues in United States, to the best of my knowledge. I am a case in point. In San Francisco, I have observed that even whites are placed in similar inhuman programs. UN's characterization of human rights violations vis-a-vis Western countries may therefore be a distortion of the historical record.
2. Now, I would like to dissect the statement, "Western countries have no record of human rights violations against their own people." There are two concepts that hold the key to understanding this statement of privilege and apriori pardon; NO RECORD and THEIR OWN PEOPLE.
A. When the UN contends that Western countries such as United States have NO RECORD of human rights violations against their own people, notice that it neither means nor says that such countries do not violate human rights, or do not have human rights issues, but, that records on such violations against their own people are either not kept or are destroyed. In other words, it cannot be proven that US violates human rights against its own people, and so US or any such Western countries could not be faltered on these crimes against humanity. This reasoning is not only nonsensical, but, indeed, fallacious. First, technical language is being used to obfuscate the fact that US and other Western countries have human rights issues, but, if such issues cannot be proven, then, they do not exist. Second, if such human rights violations are against other people, then, they do not matter. Third, are those violated, indeed, human enough to matter?
In United States there is an euphemism known as the BIG PICTURE. This was what I was first told to 'take a look at' when I arrived in 1995 seeking political asylum. I observed the picture and saw several slides and segments in it. In particular, I observed the acute homelessness, the dismal situation of poor blacks, native Indians and even the poor white. Then I observed forced gay immersion and chemical castration segments of this picture. I was told that this was the life to which I was welcome, because of my African origins and dark skin. If indignation and dehumanization are human rights issues, then, the RECORD exists in United States, NOW. How many of you have heard of racial hatred in United States? How much of such hatred is incited and instigated by the government and political leaders?
After fifteen years in the streets of United States, I am still the target of civil and sexual harassment by the public. The worst aspects of these attacks are ritual torture and molestation conducted via sorcery and other forms of voodoo and principally targeting and splitting my genitals. This horrible form of abuse render the drugging episodes a kid's game. Still, this barbaric attack is instigated by the government and managed by the likes of Nancy Pelosi, Barbara Boxer, Condoleezza Rice, The City of San Francisco, Cathy Marshall, Katherine Crier, former Senator Carole Mosley Braun, etc. But, this is not human rights violation, because, United States is a Western country and I am not one of their own people. Just world?
In 1995 President Clinton took an unprecedented step to do what his predecessors, including the self-styled human rights guru President Carter, failed to do. Bill Clinton admitted one of America's human rights secrets, the reality of the Tuskegee Project. This was the project by which 399 Black American men were used for syphilis experiments in the 1930s in a secret government project.They were followed, refused treatment and their complaints denied as groundlessly bordering on insanity. This way they dropped dead one by one like virus-infected fowls. By the time President Clinton accepted the truth and apologized for the violation, only one of these people was alive to be exonerated. Is the Tuskegee Project RECORD precedent and enough of human rights violation in United states? Moreover, how many such projects are ongoing and hidden? My case is an example of such dehumanizing projects, and this is why I have resolved to fight United States to the end.
3. When the UN contends that western countries such as United States have no human rights violations against THEIR OWN PEOPLE, I for one feel sick in my stomach realizing what privilege is being given certain countries to violate human rights without commensurate punishment. The UN seems to admit that the US for instance, would have human rights violations against people who ARE NOT THEIR OWN, and that is alright. If the violation is against people who are not YOUR OWN, then, it's okay, right? This is where you and I come in: if you are from a non-Western country and you are in the West, my friend, this is your fate. This explains why even fools, as far as they are American, have been allowed to violate me and have done so with absolute impunity, because, their behavior is without consequence. Now, you know why Condoleezza Rice, Nancy Pelosi, Katherine Crier and Cathy Marshall,and in particular, leaders of San Francisco, believe that they have the RIGHT to enslave me, molest, torture or even murder me, because, they are Americans and as such nothing would happen to them: They believe as do 'born again Christians' of a priori pardon; that is, that they would get away with it, because, the UN has assured them that the privilege of being citizens of a Western nation is that they can violate the human rights of those who are not their own people and get away with it.
Furthermore, such violators do not really believe that some people are human enough for their destruction to matter. US social engineering and eugenics policies are formulated on the belief those targeted are indeed less human than their predators. This is why white men in America are on a mission to castrate me and use drugs to dilute and attenuate my brain: They believe as does the bully boy that their crimes are already forgiven before they even commit them, and, in fact, I am inferior, anyway. This is why I call on all those convinced that human rights violations really exists in Western nations, westerners and non-Westerners who see this UN argument as illogical to join me to fight this injustice against me and other people suffering similar indignation.
Let us take the Tuskegee case for a brief example, now that we know and the record shows that Black men were used for the experiment. Was the reason that those Black men were not human enough, or they were deemed not to be Americans or AMERICA'S OWN PEOPLE? Quite telling, isn't it? Unfortunately, Black Americans are in the forefront of the torture and molestation I currently suffer in North America claiming that they are revenging against me, because, being West African, my ancestors sold their ancestors into slavery. This contention by Black Americans, whether incited or not is misguided. First, the pros thrown at me in the streets do not even know that they are working for Black American elite [including lawyers] assassins paid to destroy or kill me or other achievement aspirants from Africa. Such African Americans deliberately frame targeted Africans as radicals and militants, in order to get paid to eliminate them. Second, nobody in United States[Black or White] could show me evidence that my family sold ancestors of African Americans. If they have such proof I want to see it.
Better still, if African Americans are as aggrieved as some contend, or if they believe that the slavery issue remains a human rights issue, then, the best thing for them to do is to lodge a complaint with the United Nations or other human rights courts against African nations and the United States. The practice of mugging solitary Africans in the hinterland of this nation is not simply wrong, but indeed, a crime, a human rights crime. Moreover, it would not offer the satisfaction they seek. This is another area where the United Nations may want into look to amend its passe view and slanted policy on human rights violations in the West. Talking about violating their own people, can that principle be applied to the Black American muggings of Africans in United States? Let's I forget, the 'Born Again' Christian theology is applicable herein.
Keep reading this blog for the truth.
Ohene Boakye-Yiadom, signed: OBY .
Signed: OBY.
