.
Letter 3: NOTE TO THE READER: I sent this letter to the Solicitor General in the belief that some action would be taken by the DOJ or OSG to investigate the ‘fraud and corruption’ that had gripped this Title Vii Case. As the reader would soon realize, the said ‘fraud and corruption’ may have reached the U.S. Supreme Court. This was a case I should have won at the ‘default’ and summary judgment stages. But, the courts denied me such judgments. However, it was my belief [and it remains my belief] that some political aficionados and the media in San Francisco preemptively accused the District Court Judge [who’s African American] of ‘nepotism.’ This could have been why he turned around and used discriminatory aminus based on alienage against me [At least, African American sources indicated that the Judge realized that I was not African American], and, covered up original findings that favored me to issue another version upon which he granted the defendants summary judgment. The judge did this without a motion by the defendant or court to amend, alter or vacate the first findings. The law on this ‘plain error’ judgment favored me. There was also evidence of appearance of official obstruction of justice [colorable violation], most likely, by members of the DOJ in San Francisco. While I represented myself at all times, CDS Leopold Group, the defendants were represented by the giant law firm in Palo Alto, CA. Morrison and Foerster, LLP. At least, one of the four attorneys who appeared for defendant CDS, lead attorney, Mr. Kevin Mulcahy, turned out to be an Assistant United States Attorney, now stationed somewhere in Southern California]. Attorneys appear to have been ‘advised’ to boycott my cases in order to ensure that rent seekers, peonage adventurers and even ‘avengers’ operate unopposed within the courts to seek judgments against me. This opens up the question as to whether IT WAS the federal government, which intervened in this case, and, excoriated the Judge with ‘nepotism,’ to frighten him to rule against me, or, this was the work of power drunk politicians and political operatives known to be involved in rent seeking activity, peonage adventurism and other scams against me, who targeted me with such officially-assisted violations. I raise these and other questions at about miscarriage of justice as another ploy in the conspiracy to violate my human rights at Ohenethinkslegal.blogspot.com. I will soon publish some of the decisions on this case and the rest of my cases to reinforce my claim that I have been intentionally subjected to extreme injustice in support of an ongoing eugenics-peonage program on this continent in violation of my human rights. The issue of this Title VII case is one of many examples, which have been exploited to entrench the imposition of the ‘program.’ As the reader might have rightly guessed, I received no reply or response to this letter.
To: The Solicitor-General of the United States, 925 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20530-0001.
From: Ohene Boakye-Yiadom, 1230 Market Street, San Francisco, CA 94102.
Re: Discrimination and Systemic Bias against Ohene Boakye-Yiadom In A Title Vii Case Reaches the Clerk’s Office, Supreme Case of the United States.
Copies to: Senator Arlen Specter, Chairman, Senate Judiciary Committee
: Mr. Alberto Gonzalez, Attorney General of United States
June 6, 2006.
Dear Solicitor-General:
Pursuant to the failure of the Clerk’s office at the Supreme Court of the United States to file an application I intended for the Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court, Justice John Roberts, [invoking Supreme Court Rule 22 ], to review decisions by the U.S. District Court and the Ninth Circuit in San Francisco, and, where such failure has reinforced the abuse, discrimination, bias, aminus, etc., which led to the manifest miscarriage of justice and loss of my substantial rights in the afore-named case; and, conversant with the facts of this case, which lead me to believe that there has been wrong doing, including criminal negligence; and, faced with the fact there may not be any more adequate sources of legal redress available to me, I hereby most respectfully appeal to you and your office, and related offices dealing with civil rights to immediately step in and conduct an investigation in this matter. I am filing a similar request with the Judiciary Committee of the United States Senate to specifically request the Committee to undertake criminal investigation, which could result in the impeachment of Hon. Martin J. Jenkins, the district court judge who issued the erroneous, fraudulent and void judgment that no higher federal court in the country wants to review. It has become my informed belief that Hon. Jenkins, Judges of the Ninth Circuit and the Clerk’s office of the Supreme Court treated me this way for the following reasons.
1. That I am a slave, and as such, I do not deserve equal protection under United States law, despite violation of my rights under Title VII. This notion that I am a slave was the main reason why CDS Leopold Group, defendant-respondent in the underlying Title Vii employment discrimination case encouraged disparate treatment, harassment, wrongful firing, retaliation and other prohibited employment activities against me. There were over ten ‘illegal immigrants’ with whom I worked in this ‘health challenged’ labor environment, in San Carlos, CA. They were respected and given all privileges of the job, including ‘overtime.’ Again, the reason was and remains that I am a slave, not just because of my origin and dark skin, but that I am in fact owned by some people in the US government, who would get the money from this case and from the rest of my economic activities in this country [The names of Secretary Rice and Speaker Pelosi are mostly associated with this phenomenon, although, other so-called ‘investors’ have been exposed]. I continue to receive denigration, disrespect, taunting, dehumanization etc. from the general pubic due to this notion that I am a slave. I demand immediate answers to these questions relating slavery and slavery education from the federal government.
2. That African Americans seek revenge and retaliation against me, because of the belief that, my African ancestors sold theirs into slavery in America. It is believed that they have rallied from the U.S. Congress since the Clinton administration to the Supreme Court, and, down to San Francisco or wherever I go in this country to ensure that I do not win anything, not just in this case, but, also, in any case I file in this country. Hon. Martin Jenkins, the judge in this case, is also African American. The former Mayor of San Francisco and the current District Attorney, both African American, are said to be among leaders of this ‘opposition’ against me in this Title Vii and other cases in San Francisco. They might have been ably supported by elements of intelligence organizations whose suspicion that I have ‘something to do with Condoleeza Rice,’ Barbara Boxer, Nancy Pelosi, etc. has led them to wrongly obstruct my efforts to progress [in every aspect of my life] as punitive measures. Black American anger has been inflated with this alleged link that I supposedly have with Condoleeza Rice and these other women. The fact is that I do not know Condoleeza Rice [or any of these women vying to own me]. I hope, therefore, that United States authorities would make a public announcement on that matter to offset growing endangerment that I face from the public as a result of this ‘misconception of association’ with these women.
3. Other groups said to be opposed to me or to the rule of law are feminists led by those from the United States Congress. This is the reason why Senator Barbra Boxer and Rep. Nancy Pelosi are openly alleged to be among those obstructing justice in these cases through ‘filibustering.’ Both of these political queens from the Bay Area are said to have claimed that (i) this is an intelligence operation (ii) if they stop, Condoleeza Rice would fall. A lot of questions are up for answers as a result. The rest are gays and homosexuals, the media, judges and lawyers, businesses, gangsters and street people, law enforcement and politicians, and of course, African Americans led by Willie Brown Jr. and Kamala Harris. These people seem to have resolved to ensure that I am treated the way African Americans allegedly have been treated in this country [badly] for the rest of my life. Every kid in San Francisco knows about “Pa” and ‘Da’ and what they are up to in regard of my case: Abuse, persecution, biological warfare, death and kidnapping and hanging threats, intimidation, food poisoning, HIV/Aids scare, involuntary servitude, etc. are some of the many strategies with which I am currently targeted.
4. I believe that Judge Jenkins has retaliated against me not solely for the soreness and bitterness of the slavery question [which he seemingly shares with majority of African Americans], but, also, for the fact that I filed three reports of judicial misconduct against him for his undue delay of the Title Vii case in support of the undue seizure and torture imposed on me by the system. These reports were never investigated by Chief Judge Mary Schroeder [a clear surrogate for Senator Boxer]. Still, I have been punished by the judicial system with indecision, institutional discrimination and invidious aminus by the courts. Judicial immunity does not grant retaliation or conspiracy, but, such is the fraternal punishment I have endured from the judiciary at large. The question of slavery was not in litigation, so the judge could not institute punitive or retaliatory decisions in that regard against me. Moreover, if money changed hands to secure judgment against me as it is widely rumored, then, it was unconstitutional and a ‘non-immunity conduct,’ because, ‘bribery’ is a non-judicial activity. I have no proof of bribery. But the rumor prevails. Furthermore, judicial immunity is vacuous where a judge has no jurisdiction to proceed. Hon. Jenkins lost jurisdiction to proceed as a result of automatic disqualification he earned in the case. Yet, neither the Ninth Circuit nor the Supreme Court of the United States would review the erroneous, fraudulent and void judgment he granted against me [Empirical evidence exists of the ‘plain error’ the judge committed in this case. The question remains, however, whether the judge was called upon to perform a political, instead of, a judicial function by the political leaders in charge of this case.
While I am preparing to file a report and a complaint about the general persecution I face in this country [as a result of the exposure of a biological warfare/eugenics me in Canada and USA], I wish to file this protest solely on how a disqualified federal Judge, Hon. Jenkins has been given total authority on a Title Seven question to lord it over me, oppress me, etc., because, I am West African, loathed by African Americans[for ignoble historical reason] and resented by whites[ who deemed me as a wart]. I came to the United States to seek political asylum and to improve my life. But for twelve years, the government and people of this country have done everything to kill me, or make me an invalid, because, they believe that I am a slave or should be a slave. I have no right to be a scholar as I deem myself. I receive jeers from the public at that notion. I have been told that I am an ASSEST for Condoleeza Rice or a slave to Nancy Pelosi. And that this case is being WON for one of them. Minorities believe that Dr. Rice is in ‘competition’ against me and they have an obligation to help her succeed against me [Senator Boxer is the leader of that minority sect]. They even believe that it would be justified if I am chemically castrated, after all, I am owned. I believe that in this, a loaded case of serious human rights violations looms against US. This is not the only case that was stolen from me for America’s Super Secretary, Madame Speaker, Senators, etc. or the only wrong done to me in the names of HER, Speaker Pelosi, Senator Boxer, former Senator Carole Morsey-Braun, etc. So this would not be my last complaint. I believe that this pattern of injustice that is origin-related is wrong and unconstitutional. So I appeal to the Department of Justice and all of its Civil rights organizations and the Senate Judiciary Committee to undertake immediate investigation to determine what went wrong with the Title Vii case. The case name was Ohene Boakye-Yiadom [Plaintiff, appellant and petitioner] v. CDS Leopold Group [Defendant-Respondent]. It was first filed at the U.S. District Court for Northern California in August 2001. I was denied default judgment and several rounds of summary judgment. The case file was hurriedly stowed away to a federal storage in San Bruno early this year to forestall my appeals. The number at the District Court is C01-2683MJJ. The case has three file numbers at the Ninth Circuit and at least one number at the U.S. Supreme Court [04-6087].
5. It is believed that with a Master’s degree the last seventeen years, I have too much prospects such that if I am accepted in the United States, I would ‘jump the line of life and success’ and surpass black Americans [who have been here all their lives after I sold them] into prosperity. So, I should be denied this opportunity [Later at this website you would read my main report on these decades of abuse, and, you would read, specifically, about this plot to derail me through drugging, undermining, interference, obstruction and even magical attacks. Brown, Jenkins, Rice, Bonta, Pelosi, Boxer, Harris, etc.[Americans] are here to STOP me. It does seem to me that this is not mere black on black violence. Other factors abound. But, suffice it that factors cited here are sufficient to bring about an investigation. I am faced with a belligerent, hostile and unfriendly public that believes that I am simply an enemy. Please, take some action to institute constitutionality and civility in this matter [Because, I was invited to this country by the INS [New York, Buffalo. I have evidence of such invitation. This does not mean that I could not be rejected. Even if rejected as I have been told, I deserve respect while I am still here]. I intend to sue Judge Jenkins on principle that his unconstitutional and [un]judicial conduct, which led to a miscarriage of justice has caused me irreparable civil rights violations: No judicial immunity exists where judge proceeded, knowing that he had no jurisdiction to do so.
6. Conclusion. My question is this: if I face this level of opposition and hostility from the government and people of the United States for bringing a Title Vii case against a private employer who treated me badly, then, what would happen when I file the war crimes case against the USA? Still, I believe that all authorities charged with this case would treat this matter with the carefulness and the level-headedness it deserves. As part of the hostility towards me, and, of interference with my records, the ‘opposition’ a few weeks ago inserted a ‘memo’ in my INS records asking me to leave this country. This was part of the strategy to run me out and steal this and other cases I am set to win. I reported the matter to the USCIS Ombudsman [Letter 4]. He got the CIS to investigate the matter. I have been given a 45- day cooling period within which the CIS is expected to report back. However, hostility, harassment and animosity have since multiplied against me in San Francisco. The Clerk’s office of the U.S. Supreme Court refusal to file the application to bring my case to the Hon. Chief Justice followed this hostile trend. What am I supposed to do in this situation?
Thank you.
Sincerely, Ohene Boakye-Yiadom.
No comments:
Post a Comment