JOHN QUINCY ADAMS SAID
When you hear of John Quincy Adams you think of a great US founder, president and principal contributor to the Federalist Papers. Of course, while father and son John Adams and John Quincy Adams were great presidents, it was the former[a political theorist] who was founder and principal contributor to the Federalist Papers. Some Americans still remember that John Quincy Adams was a lawyer. But how many actually know that he was a human and civil rights-minded lawyer who actually appeared before the Supreme Court of the United States to defend the inherent rights of Africans slaves? This question and its answer offer the teaching moment for this piece, another in line with my purpose to widely publicize US crimes against humanity committed against me in broad day light, and they have been committed with the conviction that as African I am naturally unfree and inferior, and therefore, I deserved to be enslaved and mistreated. The lesson for this moment is John Quincy Adams would argue that any form of enslavement in United States would be uncivilized, regressive and unconstitutional. Do you or do you not agree?
This publication is about the elements of slavery and peonage and the education to implement such activities against me in support of US eugenics and ethnic cleansing programs that targeted me ever since I set foot on the North American continent. Wherever he is in his grave John Quincy Adams [May his soul rest in peace] would be turning his head and gnashing his teeth to learn that not only have Presidents and lawyers who came after the pioneers abandoned the sacred creed of liberty for their failure to stand up to stamp out a program openly described as "enslavement" and sponsored by US elite, but also, that such dehumanizing and regressive program is co-managed by African Americans, descendants of slaves; people who most of all should epitomize the quest for freedom and liberty.
America is at a sad trajectory in its history when the beneficiaries of the Emancipation Proclamations now lead programs and projects to enslave Africans for either profit or revenge. In United States, most Black Americans I meet have revenge and anger written all over their faces as if they have proof that my family actually sold any of their descendants. This type of juvenile reaction to a historical epoch, which neither they nor I actually took part in creating is however part of US undeclared policy to use Black Americans to harass Africans on the continent. Is it not a sad story that even in the era of President Obama, a man whose father was African, Black Americans would be paid or instigated by leading Americans to kill or even undermine Africans in United States?
In this particular case, the alleged slave trader, Bill Gates or Nancy Pelosi[Kapitalist] is the one urging Black Americans not only to harass me, but, use such form of social violence to oppress me or even push me out of United States. Some black American elite, as I have indicated elsewhere in this publication actually get paid to harass or even kill Africans in United States. These people, slave drivers or managers are part of the legitimizing process in this regressive activity in United States. Later in this publication, I will share with the reader what lawyer John Quincy Adams believed and thought about the African peoples, belief and thought which today's leaders and lawyers have either abandoned due to a compromise of their values and virtues or are too coward to muster.
If there is any aspect of the US program to destroy me that should shock the conscience of the world, civilized and uncivilized, then that is the enslavement aspect [In absence of the satanic attack component]. Due to its checkered past and infamy with this dehumanizing social institution, and particularly, due to the fact that United States promotes itself as the beginning and end of all liberties; the protector of human rights and main adherent of inalienable rights [a la the US Constitution], it would sound almost pejorative to measure United States with any policy or program, official or unofficial, aimed purposefully at enslavement, subjugation, dehumanization or denigration of an individual or a group; to wit any program that debunks in the least the idea of liberty. Unfortunately, this exactly is what this 'program' to ruin me has been; an enslavement program created and nurtured by United States.
The seriousness of this specific violation is that United States has codified laws prohibiting the same, or activities that would amount to or mimic enslavement or peonage activities. The First Amendment, which underscores the inalienability of liberty [a natural right], the Eight Amendment, which forbids cruel, wicked and inhuman treatment and the Thirteenth Amendment, which sanctions peonage and all forms of slavery activity, on paper, are effective reinforcement of the Emancipation Statutes enacted since the 1860s to ensure that no policy, program or even conspiracy to erect in any manner, shape or form, the institution of slavery would not be found to be illegal, unlawful and unconstitutional.
The equal protection clauses of the US Constitution, as well, serve caution on politicians, businesses and institutions that might be too power-drunk, albeit, regressive, as to envisage having their own slaves in modern America, as envisaged by those in this case. It is a sad note in this report that exactly this is what happened and what I am about to describe. Let American patriots, those who actually hurt and feel pain, whenever America's image is tarnished by some infamous or prohibited conduct of Americans, listen. Patriotism is not simply answering a nation's call to pick up arms and kill other people, to hate those who were born here or who are unlike us. Patriotism, love of nation, also means doing those things that would hold high the name and image of your nation in the minds of other people. Certainly, engaging in slavery, enslavement education or peonage activities or hating people from other nations and sabotaging their own life plans do not make one patriotic. But, this is what has happened in this case.
In order to show that the practice of slavery is legally, constitutionally and humanly objectionable, I offer this working definition: According to Dehumane.Org, an online dictionary, slavery exists “When a person (called master) has absolute power over another (called slave) including life and liberty.” Wikipedia, another online dictionary defines slavery as.”..a system under which people are treated as property and are forced to work forced.” Wikipedia explains further that “Slaves can be held against their will from the time of their capture, purchase or birth, and deprived of the right to leave, to refuse to work, or to demand compensation.”
From the foregoing definitions, it is apparent that slavery entails loss of liberty, mistreatment that insinuates that some person is property or is owned, a situation that mimics seizure of some person or that some person is held against his or her will by another. Slavery entails deprivation of rights, including, but, not limited to the right to work, associate or to leave the place of slavery. These features of slavery persist in my situation in United States, where in San Francisco, Nancy Pelosi and others believe that they have the social and international locks on me, because, thus far, there has not been either leadership or mass objection to this crass form of dehumanization. Even lawyers are on record of supporting the program to enslave me in United States.
I can say for sure that since the late 1980s in Canada, this has been the type of situation I have known in North America. I am aware that presently in San Francisco, security agents of United States, California and County of San Francisco have been detailed to track me and kill me should I make the effort to escape. Homosexuals and Black American Muslims are also said to be the alert for me. This supports, not my suggestion, but the suggestion of the American people that I am in slavery, bought and owned by United States and its citizens, including Bill Gates, Nancy Pelosi and perhaps Katherine Crier, and managed by Condoleezza Rice and others for profit. What? This is not fiction.
The Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, passed by the Senate on April 8, 1864, by the House on January 31, 1865, and ratified on December 6, 1865, abolished slavery as a legal institution in United States [ See Article I, Section 9 and “a person held to service or labor” in Article IV, Section 2. The Thirteenth Amendment, in direct terminology, put an end to this].
The amendment states:
Section 1:
"Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
Section 2:
Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation."
In a later publication, I will show that some aspects of this enslavement program is said to be for punishment purposes, although, I have not been convicted of any violation in United States or anywhere subject to their jurisdiction. At that time, I will also show that the US Congress has acted against the spirit and letter of all appropriate legislation or statutes that prohibit enslavement and its legacies with its support for the programs involving slavery.
Prior to enactment of the Thirteenth Amendment, a man who became US President, John Quincy Adams represented slaves before the Supreme Court, and made an impassioned argument for their freedom, in the case of the Amistad Survivors. The Court, in United States v. Libellants of Schooner Amistad, 40 U.S. 518 (15 Pet. 518), 10 L. Ed. 826, affirmed the district court and agreed with John Quincy Adams that the Africans were free persons.
Why did John Adams refuse to join other white people to oppress and enslave the Amistad Survivors? The answer is pretty straight forward: He was a man of conviction, a thorough scholar who believed in the principles of the First Amendment and dignity of people no matter their racial background. He believed that liberty was a God-given right to be enjoyed by Asians, Europeans, Africans and, indeed, all mankind. Not Surprisingly, the Supreme Court of United States agreed with him. Can we have lawyers and leaders stand up with the same conviction in United States in 2011?
Unfortunately, it appears as if there are no John Adamses in today's lawyers and leaders. If there were, those would be the ones who would remind the violators in this case of how regressive and [un]patriotic it would be for anybody in to think of it, let alone institute programs to enslave Africans in United States. Even the Black American apostles of civil liberties, those of the religious conviction that all people are born to be treated justly appear to support this egregious violation. They also seek revenge.
The Thirteenth Amendment itself does not apologize for slavery in United States [some Europeans too were enslaved]. However, prior to the presidential elections of 2008, the Congress passed a resolution to apologize for slavery and all its legacies. I have gone to this extent to retract history to show that this program, which Americans believe is slavery and enslavement education is illegal and prohibited in United States, and the political leaders of this country have shown on paper that they do not subscribe to such dehumanization or condone it. In practice however, the story is different. United states has taken the backward slide from civilization.
I have also shown that even US Courts and a famous US President agreed that Africans, natural persons just as Asians and Europeans, have natural rights and freedoms equivalent to those described in the First Amendment. Africans are not robots made in some German or Japanese factory to mimic human beings. Africans have souls, blood, emotions and aspirations. Africans even pray to a God, just as Europeans do. Africans marry, work and reproduce. Africans do not need permission from white people to do any of these things. I do not need permission from any American, white or black, to do anything that I wish to do in life.
Consequently, there has to be personal hatred or resurgence of some congenital hatred for people of African descent, to explain why Africans in general are deemed undeserved of these rights, and why I in particular, have been targeted to this degree of dehumanization by United States. I believe that I have underscored these two factors in my discussions and I would refer to them often in future.
With that in mind, I now turn to explanations offered by Americans themselves for why United States and its citizens believe that they have the right to enslave me. This is no fiction.
1. I was awarded scholarships by St. Jerome's University in Waterloo, Ontario, Canada and Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, for undergraduate and graduate studies. Towards the end of my graduate program, I received a bursary stipend form the Canadian International Development Agency [CIDA]. Also, when I enrolled in Ottawa University Law in 1993 [As the first evidence of the assault against me, my enemies used Satanic attacks to force me out of Ottawa, and so, I had to withdraw from the LLB. Program], I received a government guaranteed loan and a small subvention for my studies. According to Americans, the money I received as scholarships, stipends, bursaries, subventions, etc, was taxpayers' money, and therefore, I have been enslaved forever by the taxpayers in return. The money was not from the US Treasury and USAID did not grant me the scholarships. So wherein lies the rationality about “taxpayers' money” for which the US should enslave me to repay?
This suggestion has left me with at least, two scenarios from which to infer;
A. Some people actually suggest that St Jerome's, the first university to award me scholarship money sold me to United States and Bill Gates for them to use me as a 'guinea pig' for medical research and homosexual experiments, after the university had secretly practiced the experiment on me. This would be a darn serious human rights violation, would it not? The paucity in this suggestion relates to the fact that the President of St. Jerome's, when I was enrolled, was a United States citizen, and an alleged spy for United States and Vatican, a man who apparently did not like me. The results of his hatred are not fictitious.
Father Norman Choate allegedly started the program of sexual harassment, abuse and secret medication against me at St Jerome's, where he sarcastically named me “The Monkey,” because he believed that I was a down syndrome of a type, not quite cut for college stuff, but quite cut for experiments. Instead, I would be better used as a guinea pig in America, where Kapitalists and medical researchers need raw materials for their investments and experiments. I still cannot believe that a Catholic Father and head of the university which offered me the opportunity to advance was the one who came out with such suggestion to deal with the “noble savage”[another termed he allegedly coined for me]. So, he had to fulfill the cause of his people, Americans and Kapitalists.
Bill Gates and his cohorts mentioned in this conspiracy allegedly believe that to own a person is part of capitalism, and therefore, as kapitalists, they have the right to own me and use me for whatever they want, but particularly, for profit. Apparently, the US government supports this view and conduct, despite the fact that it is aware that the conduct is illegal, unconstitutional and offensive. I am reminded that, maybe, Adam Smith would not agree if he were alive today, that the Wealth of Nations depended on slavery. However, I will accept correction from members of the Adams Smith Society.
2.The second tale, also suggested by Americans is that the US government and its citizens, either bought me from or transferred me from the Canadian government to be enslaved and re-educated to make me see myself as inferior and a slave to white people. Part of this explanation is that, Americans felt that the Canadians had failed to properly control and destroy me as secretly plotted. Particularly, Americans admonished Canadians for allowing me to get college education, when what had been agreed upon was slavery education. Worse still, allowing me to express myself in classrooms, seminars and workshops was a mistake. They, the Americans, used to watch me in Canadian classrooms via video and satellite and wondered why Canadians allowed a slave to express himself at all.
They, the Americans, weaned at oppressing and destroying black people, and apparently proud of it, decided to get me down here to complete the enslavement and ruination activities. Americans intended to “reprogram” me not only to make me abandon pursuit of academic and professional goals, but also, to make me see white people as my Masters and superiors. I was supposed to be an alcoholic, drug abuser, criminal and failure. In this way, white Americans intended to appease African Americans that I am not better than Black Americans. The latter have as a result supported this program. The sociology of race in social structuring is part of the goals of the social engineering aspects of the program. Apparently, United States ran out of Black American guinea pigs and so extended the search to Africans.The message is disheartening and alarming: United States has a universal paradigm of [dis]respect and disregard for peoples of African origins, and perhaps, even pose a security threat to such peoples. This is not simply about Ohene Boakye-Yiadom. Still, let us continue to use him as the case study.
But, of course, this does not make sense, you might suggest. But it does. The tale source credited to Condoleezza Rice and allegedly sealed by Nancy Pelosi is that I am neither Ghanaian nor African, but, in fact, Black American, a descendant of American bought slaves who ESCAPED to Africa, then sought scholarship to study in Canada, in the belief that white American slave owners could never capture me. But using modern technology, the sharp eyes and minds of its INTELLIGENCE, of course led by Condoleezza Rice and Cathy Marshall[currently the leading EYE], United States spotted me in Canada. They deployed MAGIC and super TECHNOLOGY to CAPTURE me back to enslavement in United States. This is why I should be tortured, re-educated and re-inducted. Do you love this story or not?
You see, the Americans love IT, no matter how specious all this sounds. This is the type of psychology the powerful few have used to control and repress the powerless majority in United States since the Cold War. And by the way, both Condoleezza Rice and Nancy Pelosi are known great STORY TELLERS in America. In United States, “I am telling a story,” simply means, “ I am telling a lie.” Why would an African American be associated with such a specious conspiracy against an African scholar? Is there a white American behind the scenes feeding on the effrontery of Condoleezza Rice and African Americans? Why have no Black Americans [Alf Israel, for instance] openly spoken up about this case, if African Americans have been used as the “doormat” for this crime? Why we ponder answers to these questions, I would like to introduce the third version of the story line about the enslavement program.
3.A third explanation connects Ghana and my family to the alleged purchase. Earlier on, in 1995-98, I used to hear that, “ME bought you from your father.” Although some people tried to confuse me about “the father,” by claiming this was my birth father [just as my family should be Katherine Crier, Condoleezza Rice or some other American, not Ghanaians], I eventually deduced that "father” here referred to Father Norman Choate, President of St. Jerome's who allegedly started and spread the medication attack, satanic torture and programs that are now full blown American operated.
This failure to confuse me proved that ATOR, TOPROLL and similar drugs for memory erosion that have used against me had their limits. Of course, I would be the last to believe that those seeking ways to kill or destroy me with prescription drugs and injections in San Francisco have given up. In particular, indifference to my reports about such misconduct by US authorities has emboldened the conspirators to continue with this nefarious objective. For example, narcotics and alcoholic attacks continue in the hospitals against me in San Francisco where the now shaken conspirators wish that I would simply drop dead. That is, after failure of the suicide trick, they want me to kill myself for the enemy's cover up. From Florida where he hides, I hear that Father Norman still is on his conspiracy game. I believe that the citizens among others have coded either him or his second "YOUR."
4.The purchase connection with the government of Ghana was that, indeed, either US bought me from Ghana or obtained permission from Ghana to use me as 'guinea pig,' and in exchange, provide Ghana with foreign aid, after US agents convinced Ghanaian leaders that I was an enemy of my own country. In other words, even if I say that I am not a descendant of American bought slaves, then, the Kapitalist would show that there is enough money in America to spend on enslaving and destroying me. This time, United States and the Kapitalist would take the purchase program to Ghana and get the Ghanaian leadership on board. Ghana as I have learned from Americans was sold on the idea and money.
This arrangement, if true, began during the Rawlings era, late 1980s. This was the time of World Bank, IMF and western organizations pervasive infiltration to Ghana in the name of structural adjustment programs. President Clinton visited Ghana at a time when I was sending scores of letters to the White House and the President of Ghana about my situation. But, the situation worsened from that time onwards. Was it not ironic that President Clinton in 1995 apologized for the Tuskegee Project, [a US government syphilis research which used 399 Black men from the Macon area in Georgia and watched as most of them untreated dropped dead one by one], while he was indifferent to a similar program on me? Apparently, US somehow got Ghana involved in the conspiracy without Ghana being aware of the lies and deception sold to it by America.
Notable among these was that I hated Rawlings because he was Ewe and his father was Irish. From what I have been able to glean thus far, US offered to kill me for Rawlings. Such a killing was to be extrajudicial and for the purpose of RITES, and not for the sake of the leadership in Ghana. If I hated Rawlings because of his parentage, then, it means I hated his parents, right? This is exactly what the enemy has tried to showcase against me, especially, with white audiences. The fact is that I bore Rawlings or no Ghanaian leader hatred. I only disagreed with certain policy directions in Ghana and as a bona fide Ghanaian, I have the right to participate in the policy debates in Ghana. Let no American tell me that I do not have the right to talk about Ghana.
Ghana's role in the conspiracy allegedly accentuated during the Kuffor Presidency [2000-20008], because, as a fellow Akan, Americans feared that Kuffor could expose this crime, unlike the Ewe Rawlings. The Bush and Kuffor governments forged ties, which cemented the Ghana -USA alliance. These Presidents and their governments visited each other two times for a total of four. During these eight years, I sent my most eloquent pleadings to both Presidents, but my situation worsened, each time I did. Most of the damages and personal injuries I have accumulated or worsened during the eight years of Bush-Kuffor administrations.
Both Presidents are lawyers, and therefore, resolved[it is alleged] to help the lawyer who is alleged to be at the center of the gay scam in the case. Sadly, unlike John Quincy Adams, these lawyers and presidents could not stand up for liberty. What would John Quincy Adams think or say about today's lawyers and leaders who cannot stand up to witness that Africans are free people?
The news is whenever I managed to get the Ghanaian leadership's attention to the matter, the Americans symbolically transferred ownership to Condoleezza Rice, on the assumption that Africans would not expose her, being someone with African blood who has achieved fame and popularity. Instead, they would blame me and ask for my head. African leaders would suggest that I should be sacrificed for this Kapitalist oppression to cover up for the offenders. Of course, placing African Americans in front of the case so that white people could work from the scenes has always been the hypocritical strategy of United States in this case. But, has US going to manipulate the government and my family in Ghana against me so as to enslave me not gone too far in the betrayal of liberty?
Condoleezza Rice, it has been alleged was used as PROXY to convince not just Rawlings, but also Kuffor and Atta Mills and their governments that, either I was a criminal under investigation in United States, or I signed a contract to be used for research and experiments and in exchange marry a prosperous homosexual [gay], or that I was already destroyed, so there was no need for the leaders of Ghana to worry over me. Professor Rice or another professor she covers up for is said to be manager of the program for enslavement, gay immersion and ruination. In her role is protector of the white people in this crime, she hides those seeking my blood and body parts for rites. Even more alarming, there is information that Professor Rice herself with support from African Americans wants the program as her own reparation project. United States owns and uses Black Americans and I the African from Ghana should pay them reparations.
Whether this storyline was given to Ghana by Condoleezza Rice or not, somehow, it was, and remains an official story line from United States to Canada and Ghana about my situation. The purpose of the falsehood, of course, is to perpetually hold me in enslavement in United States. Akans phrases such as “Kamu,” literally, 'disappear within' [remain here forever] and “Waka mu,” “You are here permanently,” used by Americans to taunt and scorn me prove the intent of perpetual holding. Meanwhile, US officials tell tales to get officials from Ghana and Canada to ignore my petitions. Here, the most doubted, as far as I am concerned are the Canadians and Ghanaians. As for the Americans, they have made no nonsense of what this is; a program of enslavement, capitalist investments, medical experiments, gay immersion, ruination and, errr rites, right?
In the next publication at this site, I will continue with discussion of the reasons for the enslavement program to show why United States must acknowledge the crime and severely punish those responsible for it.
Ohene Boakye-Yiadom.
NB: Please, visit www.ohenesparadigm.org and www.nanablogspolitical.blogspot.com for more information on this American scandal. oby.
Thursday, April 28, 2011
Wednesday, March 16, 2011
DEATH PANELS IN SAN FRANCISCO TARGET GHANAIAN: MAY GHANA SPEAK OUT
Publisher's Note:
At my last posting, I indicated that this publication would be about the elements of peonage and slavery officially instituted against me in United States. This is not that publication. Still, this publication prepares the reader for the ultimate discourse on such regressive choices by United States. oby.
When I describe my situation in United States as one of destruction by Americans, I am sure that many non-Americans would not believe what they hear: The father of liberty and freedom, destroyer? Some might even believe it, as propagated by Phuba Nancy Pelosi and the hooligans around her, that I am insane [Not kidding that 'insanity inducement' has been one of the goals of the illegal drugging program. Did the Phuba put the horse before the cart?]. But, in fact, in every way you assess the situation; spiritually, secularly, human, socially, biologically or professional, ruination this Ghanaian is the ultimate objective of the program; eugenics qua biological warfare and social engineering, ferociously waged, even with satanic and witchcraft instruments. What happened to logic and rationality which allegedly governed the American exceptionalism? Gone with winds of success? How do you justify 'dependency" and "enslavement" in this sense as American?
One of the pillars of this destruction program is the subprogram of "dependency." I discussed the role of 'dependency' in the personality remolding and restructuring [social engineering] aspect of this crime in my last publication at www.nanablogspolitical.blogspot.com. Still, there is one caveat in it that I would like to share with the reader. This has to do with some of the contradictions in adopting such a regressive policy in a modern logical capitalist society.
In a legal-rational society, people are expected to think and earn a living, and then, help to pay taxes for the state to carry out its duties and obligations. Capitalism reinforces this tendency to encourage people to invest their resources [ including skills] not simply to earn a living, but also, to achieve. This achievement may include acquisition of property, but, definitely, enjoyment of freedom and liberty. These ideals, no nation in modern times symbolizes better than United States. This is why I believe that it is a significant contradiction, an anachronism, if you like, when United States goes out there to attack an individual practicing exactly what US preaches to the world [rational pursuits], to place him in a program of retardation just to prevent him from realizing the fruits of the 'legal-rational model' because, this individual is not the type from whom society should expect such achievement, because, he is dark skinned African.
So, apparently, in United States success is preserved. The crime that began as an acute form invidious discriminatory animus is now a grandstanding hate crime. The problem is that I was not a member of the American family, where my success would have been viewed by racial and ethnic auturkists as a setback for their own race or ethnicity. In other words, i was not a factor of America's work place racial and ethnic politics. I was and remain African, pure breed from Ghana. So, apparently, United States committed a crime in aberration of the legal-rational model of socialization it purports to symbolize and promote. The social contract which regulates the conduct of individuals and promotes social order within nations is also applicable to the international society vis-a-vis the behavior of nations and organizations. It appears to me as if United States has violated rules of the international order with this crime.
The contradiction even worsens when the people who plotted such a regressive activity decided that the victim should not worry, because, there are all sorts of 'benefits" programs to take care of the dependentistas of his type. But, as soon as such dependentistas, thus created, apply for the benefits to which the policy maker condemned them, they are met with uproars of protest from the policy makers and their constituents, now renamed taxpayers [the limiters, protectionists, autarkyists]. These were the same people who did not want some people to work or achieve, because, they did not deserve it; society would fend for them, if they rested on their arses. or, if they were placed in programs of idleness and destruction. Now, they are protesting. Now, they want to tell us that they is logical and rational, so they cite work, work hard, not benefits! "Do not give my tax money to the bomb, otherwise, I will send cops to kill him" These are the same people who would tell the rest of the world about capitalism, individual rights, freedom and liberty, and how choice making [market], if well-harnessed, would make individuals, groups, nations and the world prosperous and happy.
Still, same individuals are among those turning the wheel backwards in America on rationality; when it comes to promoting individual well-being, as in my case. These people, instead want to create a reservoir of people, lazy, dependent, sick and useless. Then soon, they would create programs to further dehumanize this sector of society or eliminate its members and call it capitalism: May the fittest of the fittest live. Americans have reached this stage in my case with the advent of enslavement and its education or lessons. Read about how this evil and regressive social crime has been instituted against me in North America in violation of the Geneva Conventions. My next publication at nanablogspolitical.blogspot.com would discuss the issues of "lessons" and "education' in this great American crime.
Ohene Boakye-Yiadom.
UPNEXT: The discourse on the enslavement of Ohene Boakye-Yiadom, because, he is West African.
FREEWEBSITES2.0
Monday, March 7, 2011
UNITED STATES ENSLAVES GHANAIAN TO PROVE AMERICAN SUPERIORITY [1]
Were they or were they not, Karl Marx and Engels, who educated the world of the notion that man was born free, but everywhere he is in chains? Marx and Engels, as expected, were concerned about the alleged exploitation of labor by capital in industrialized societies, where by chains, I believe they meant oppression from the socio-economic relations, which the lower classes experienced in Advanced Capitalist Societies. I bet that by chains the two gurus were not referring to the enslavement of people of African descent in United States, which is the focus of my discussion. Otherwise, Marx and Engels would have said the Black man was born free, but everywhere in United States, he is chains. To which I would have added, I was born free in Africa, but, in United states, I am in chains, because, in the American psyche, my ancestry is the very repertoire of for enslavement.
Actually, I am talking about the audacity of the Americans to extend the CHAINS that they believe they have around the necks of African/Black Americans to me, a bona fide Ghanaian. “You are in CHAINS was one of the first salutations I received from Americans when I braced the cold and snow to trek across from the Northern Neighborhood where as I learned slave raiders had been sent from the South to drive me out of what they considered a hideout or haven from the wrath of the arcane slave owners. US punitive raid against me in Canada was an unjustifiable violation of international law and my human rights, but the Americans have not as yet risen to full realization of this reality. The American belief is that given their experience with African Americans, they can confidently conclude that this African cannot disobey United States order.
There is a logic, a rationality to this audacity, nonetheless. American supremacists, I have learned, believe that in the era of the American Century, and with the unchallenged success of global capitalism, American power and influence could be extended to every nook and corner of the earth and over every people and nationality on this planet with ease. In other words, social and economic relations in United States, would be extrapolated, replicated and juxtaposed on the rest of the world, whether the rest of the world likes it or not, as proof that the American Century has arrived.
One of such sociopolitical relations notably American is the divide between whites and blacks where the former are Masters and the latter slaves. In the American Century, it appears to me that United States believes that Americans should extend this demeaning and dehumanizing social relations they enjoy at the expense of African Americans to all people of African origin and ancestry. In other words, Africans must be enslaved by white Americans, because, Africans and Black Americans are of the same ancestry. Therefore, the assumed success of subjugating the African American offers the American a model for handling all other people of African ancestry.
As a matter of fact, it is a classic belief among white Americans that your average black American man would never dare disobey an authoritative white man. The wrong reasoning in this assumption apparently is that even if the so-called average African American showed respect to the so-called authoritative white man [regarding among other things position or specific issue], this must be understood as the black American sees the white man as his Master, and the respect he just showed was obedience, a forced and compulsory response to a higher order, because, he is a slave, an inferior human being. In my experience, this is the typology in which white Americans want to organize their relations with Africans, and in particular, with me. Even worse, they want mediate such relations with slavery and homosexuality.
Americans seem to query thus, why is what is good for the gander not good for the goose? A man was born black, he is inferior, whether he was born in America or Africa. Of course, if I applied the goose and gander analogy differently, I could question why white Americans, Arabs and Chinese deserve freedom and liberty, but not the man or woman of Africans ancestry? And if I ventured so, would I not be vindicated by the First Amendment of the US Bill of Rights? When it comes to inherent [natural]rights and the black man, it appears to me as if in Pelosi country, received wisdom is that logic, rationality, common sense and the constitution should take back seat.I believe that Americans who share in this belief, in 2011 United States, must be ashamed of themselves.
Such regressive [backward looking] tendencies complicate the equal protection statutes, the Thirteenth Amendment and the emancipation proclamations of the US constitution, a document touted as the model for governance and civil politics for many modern nations. This is the context in which I will discuss, in my next publication, the enslavement element is US persecutory programs imposed on me for decades. As most might have gleaned from my publications already, white Americans tried one of their favorite typologies [The average African American versus the authoritative white man] on me and woefully failed. Fully expounded, this view states that the average African American male would always obey the authoritative white man. This view has been used and continues to be used to shape dynamics between white men and black men in United States. As you might have guessed, the results have been devastating to black men, because, they have been forced to submit to the will of white men in every imaginable way. Americans have ceaselessly tried to organize their relations with me in this typology. It is the failure of such effort [particularly, gay immersion]that has created a scandalous crisis in this case.
One such failure is the demand by white men and the leadership in North America that I become homosexual, an insult which I have spat back into their faces. Whether it was the President of United States, billionaire Bill Gates, Politician Nancy Pelosi, or whether they were professors, lawyers and doctors who decided that because they were in places of authority, they would drive roughshod through me by fixing me with a deviant behavior, they forgot that power, prestige or even authority does not confer the right to impose evil and wrong choices on individuals. They may exercise such right against Americans, but, certainly not against me, a bona fide Ghanaian. I do consider homosexuality an evil choice, in the point of view of my religion and culture, and my sovereign right to be who and what I so wish. In terms of deviancy, homosexuality was not the only means by which United States sought such portrayal against me. The lessons of misbehavior in this nefarious project of social engineering included criminality, drug addiction, laziness, alcoholism, economic dependency and abject poverty. I was supposed to learn to acquire these habits just as they are associated with African Americans.
Homosexual immersion became the biggest hit with the people because most North Americans could identify with it. It is used for entertainment and as an instrument of population control and elimination of the lineage of undesired people. People with dark skin and African descent are in this target group. Moreover, the fact that Americans insist that they would “embarrass me” with this deviant behavior supports my position, not only that homosexuality is a wrong choice, but also, that indeed, those imposing that choice know that it is a wrong choice.
Moreover, just because they believe that they could dictate to African Americans does not mean that they have the right to extrapolate such imposition of denigration onto this African individual.Such a tendency [the typology of choosing winners and losers, regardless of effort and capability] is oppressive, tyrannical and regressive. But, what has been done in this case is worse than choosing winners and losers; it is creating Master-slave relations with the mindset that whatever the Master tells the slave to do the slave would do. The extension of this reasoning is that if the slave refuses to obey the Master, then the Master would have to force out obedience from the slave. If such force fails, then, the Master would have to be oppressive, torturous and even violent. This is exactly the situation of the instant case. In the mapping of these Master-slave relations, the Master is the knoll and the slave is the valley part of the topography. This is exactly what Americans have seized and confined me to implement against me. If this fails, then, many hearts would be broken.
Why would something as egregious and offensive as described here take place in United States with its professed adherence to constitutionalism, the rule of law, freedoms, rights and liberty? Better yet, where did all the liberals and progressives in American go for such a thing to happen to a person of African origins when such are the people[minorities?] whose causes leftist claim to champion? Of course, many of you reading this question already know that the alleged liberal-progressive defense of minorities in America is negative patronage, a notion washed up with hypocrisy. But that would be another discussion in another publication.
What of the vociferous constitutionalists, those who champion the cause of the rule of law, individual rights, freedom and liberty, the right to pursue happiness; albeit, defenders of inalienable rights, the conservatives, where have they been for such denigration and dehumanization that implicate the gene of their belief system [their core values?] to take place in United States without protest? When at all, do universal principles matter?
After years of keenly observing the workings of the American system, in particular, in the context of this case, I have arrived at a common answer for both questions. And it is a simple answer, bipartisanism; situations of belief and policy on which the two main opposing parties in United states agree. Since in this discussion reference to parties is not limited to the GOP and the Democrat Party per se, I have concluded that the the concept, Americanism, aptly describes this phenomenon more than bipartisanism. Still, for all analytical purposes both concepts are inter-operative.
If the issue is bipartisan, in United States, it is accepted that most Republicans and most Democrats share in the belief giving rise to the issue and support the policy derived from that issue. This would be similar for conservatives and liberals, the right and left. Of course, the center is icy, and therefore, middle ground issues usually chill into one of the dichotomies. In other words, a center does not exist in bipartisanism, because, it is conflated into the two main competing sides.
Another sense in which the concept is at play is as in my case, where in addition to the agreement among the poles described above, similar consensus has been built between whites and blacks, males and females, old and young, heterosexual and homosexual, citizen and immigrant, majority and minority to frame, oppress, humiliate and destroy this African to protect America. This is bipartisanism put together by US Intelligence and politicians in the age of the American Century. I define this phenomenon as Americanism. By extension, this means that Americans have to unite whenever one or some of them have an issue with a non-American. Is there something wrong with Americans uniting to protect their interests and security?
Of course, the keener observer would notice that reference herein made to unity is to suggest that force is used to make individuals compliant in situations where they would have behaved differently. These situations include where the American, otherwise, would be the one who was at fault, but to whose side the people are instigated to rally. Americans can't allow American fail in as much as justice would benefit the other. This is the aspect of Americanism at play in my case. The issue could be or not about national interest. The only requirement needed to invoke Americanism is that a party to such a conflict is American.
White and black, conservative and liberal, man and woman, boy and girl, citizen and immigrant, Republican and Democrat, believe that those who violated me must be protected, even if that means that I continue to suffer till I drop dead here in United states. In fact, “We should all support America,” remains the fabric of the societal agreement to carry on with the conspiracy. “ Otherwise, society would fall and hearts would be broken” “He is capable of destroying community.” In this sense of Americanism, America does no wrong. “After all, Bill Gates acquired the guy, there should be no fear subjugating him.” With this mindset, diversion from absolute loyalty and the slightest sign of unfettered allegiance requite severe punishment from Americana. The media, courts, ethnicities, bureaucracies, social, political and civil organizations must respond commonly to this loyalty compliance feed system to protect America. “The guy was acquired.” America must protect this system of acquisition, namely, enslavement, no matter how specious the conspiracy. If such acquisition actually took place, it would still be a crime, an egregious violation of the Universal declaration of Human Rights
When the message is communicated to the people then that Ohene is in CHAINS, that he is the white man's dog, so acquired for experiments and to be a homosexual, every body is expected to treat him with disrespect, because, he is a slave, he has the social rank of a domesticated animal and he lives a deviant lifestyle. In the American Century, even if the people know otherwise, they would be told to shut up and play for America. This is the system of absolute loyalty and unfettered allegiance, the choking of expression and the closure for liberty, Americanism.
Even African Americans do not find such denigration likened to their status revolting and objectionable. Some of them are relieved to see Africans suffer in this country.In fact, one of them uses the Akan phrase for "suffer" ["di eyaw" or "di yaw"] to convey the level of her satisfaction with the dire predicament that I face in this case in America. Similarly, following African American hate examples, Americans taunt me with "enjoy or experience poverty" ['di hia' or 'di ohia']. To the satisfaction of the slave drivers, the American public actually loves these dehumanizing taunts and mistreatment.
Most of them are comforted to see me tortured and oppressed. In San Francisco, Africans Americans are comforted to know that I am treated like a slave and homosexual, social categories designed to isolate some of them from modernity. For them this is exoneration that all people of African ancestry must serve and obey the white man, freedom and liberty eschewed, or better yet, must be preserved for whites and Americans. African/Black Americans have made huge emotional investments in this case, and as such, if the programs stop, or if I am let go alive, African/Black American hearts would be broken.
As so-called defenders of the system that denigrates them, African Americans have their own agenda of torment and punishment for Africans like me. This is why the elite among them [the slave drivers] have actively led the oppressive activities against me in United States. Despite civil rights agitations and public postures that tend to suggest fraternity with Africans, I am convinced that this is the level of bipartisanship that has provide white violators in the case protection against prosecution for these human rights violations. African American elite extend the ends of their chains to black people for white acceptance., perhaps, mutual protection, confident that Africans would never figure it out. They feel so superior to Africans so as to believe that they are shielded from exposure just by the very fact of that sense of that feel superiority. Is this false consciousness? Whatever this is, the black-white bipartisanship provided the comfort zone not only for the slave raiders, but also, for the gay and sex change practitioners, who would also be heart broken, should I end up not being homosexual. Do you see how a hate crime of this horrible nature has been turned into a project of emotions by supremacist, African/Black Americans and homosexuals?
The failure of the effort to extend American exploitative, punitive and oppressive relations mediated by African Americans and gays to me is what this scandal is all about. When United States sends troops to attack a Ghanaian studying in Canada to STOP his advancement, this is not a political matter resolvable in-house in America, because, the Ghanaian is not a member of the American polity. This is an international criminal matter, which calls for audience in an appropriate international forum. If the objective of the US raid on this Ghanaian was to show that US could extend its domination to all people of African ancestry, and to prove that as far as US is concerned, all people of African origins can and must be enslaved, or must be mistreated, oppressed and dominated by white people, then, this is more than an international political issue. I hope that the African Union would wake up to this missive, because, this is a declared biological warfare against Africans.
If United States leaders and its most mentioned businessman in connection with this case, Bill Gates, believe that due to their power and money, they would acquire me against all reason and laws, interfere in my life to prevent me from succeeding against prudence, impose homosexual programs on to humiliate me and stunt my lineage in violation of all international human rights laws, then, I would expect that all reasonable, civilized and conscientious people would find such activities to be unlawful and objectionable. If Americans are concerned not with the destruction of my life, career and family, but, instead, with all the soft American hearts broken, then, this is vile Americanism. This is why I have resolved that I will break more of these hearts rather than allow the enemy to break my family or me.
Ohene Boakye-Yiadom
TRAFFIC LINKS
Get Traffic Supremacy now... Click here!
CHECK OUT TRAFFIC SUPREMACY!
WEBSITES2.0, FREE EVERY MONTH! CLICK HERE.
ADVERTYZE.COM
Actually, I am talking about the audacity of the Americans to extend the CHAINS that they believe they have around the necks of African/Black Americans to me, a bona fide Ghanaian. “You are in CHAINS was one of the first salutations I received from Americans when I braced the cold and snow to trek across from the Northern Neighborhood where as I learned slave raiders had been sent from the South to drive me out of what they considered a hideout or haven from the wrath of the arcane slave owners. US punitive raid against me in Canada was an unjustifiable violation of international law and my human rights, but the Americans have not as yet risen to full realization of this reality. The American belief is that given their experience with African Americans, they can confidently conclude that this African cannot disobey United States order.
There is a logic, a rationality to this audacity, nonetheless. American supremacists, I have learned, believe that in the era of the American Century, and with the unchallenged success of global capitalism, American power and influence could be extended to every nook and corner of the earth and over every people and nationality on this planet with ease. In other words, social and economic relations in United States, would be extrapolated, replicated and juxtaposed on the rest of the world, whether the rest of the world likes it or not, as proof that the American Century has arrived.
One of such sociopolitical relations notably American is the divide between whites and blacks where the former are Masters and the latter slaves. In the American Century, it appears to me that United States believes that Americans should extend this demeaning and dehumanizing social relations they enjoy at the expense of African Americans to all people of African origin and ancestry. In other words, Africans must be enslaved by white Americans, because, Africans and Black Americans are of the same ancestry. Therefore, the assumed success of subjugating the African American offers the American a model for handling all other people of African ancestry.
As a matter of fact, it is a classic belief among white Americans that your average black American man would never dare disobey an authoritative white man. The wrong reasoning in this assumption apparently is that even if the so-called average African American showed respect to the so-called authoritative white man [regarding among other things position or specific issue], this must be understood as the black American sees the white man as his Master, and the respect he just showed was obedience, a forced and compulsory response to a higher order, because, he is a slave, an inferior human being. In my experience, this is the typology in which white Americans want to organize their relations with Africans, and in particular, with me. Even worse, they want mediate such relations with slavery and homosexuality.
Americans seem to query thus, why is what is good for the gander not good for the goose? A man was born black, he is inferior, whether he was born in America or Africa. Of course, if I applied the goose and gander analogy differently, I could question why white Americans, Arabs and Chinese deserve freedom and liberty, but not the man or woman of Africans ancestry? And if I ventured so, would I not be vindicated by the First Amendment of the US Bill of Rights? When it comes to inherent [natural]rights and the black man, it appears to me as if in Pelosi country, received wisdom is that logic, rationality, common sense and the constitution should take back seat.I believe that Americans who share in this belief, in 2011 United States, must be ashamed of themselves.
Such regressive [backward looking] tendencies complicate the equal protection statutes, the Thirteenth Amendment and the emancipation proclamations of the US constitution, a document touted as the model for governance and civil politics for many modern nations. This is the context in which I will discuss, in my next publication, the enslavement element is US persecutory programs imposed on me for decades. As most might have gleaned from my publications already, white Americans tried one of their favorite typologies [The average African American versus the authoritative white man] on me and woefully failed. Fully expounded, this view states that the average African American male would always obey the authoritative white man. This view has been used and continues to be used to shape dynamics between white men and black men in United States. As you might have guessed, the results have been devastating to black men, because, they have been forced to submit to the will of white men in every imaginable way. Americans have ceaselessly tried to organize their relations with me in this typology. It is the failure of such effort [particularly, gay immersion]that has created a scandalous crisis in this case.
One such failure is the demand by white men and the leadership in North America that I become homosexual, an insult which I have spat back into their faces. Whether it was the President of United States, billionaire Bill Gates, Politician Nancy Pelosi, or whether they were professors, lawyers and doctors who decided that because they were in places of authority, they would drive roughshod through me by fixing me with a deviant behavior, they forgot that power, prestige or even authority does not confer the right to impose evil and wrong choices on individuals. They may exercise such right against Americans, but, certainly not against me, a bona fide Ghanaian. I do consider homosexuality an evil choice, in the point of view of my religion and culture, and my sovereign right to be who and what I so wish. In terms of deviancy, homosexuality was not the only means by which United States sought such portrayal against me. The lessons of misbehavior in this nefarious project of social engineering included criminality, drug addiction, laziness, alcoholism, economic dependency and abject poverty. I was supposed to learn to acquire these habits just as they are associated with African Americans.
Homosexual immersion became the biggest hit with the people because most North Americans could identify with it. It is used for entertainment and as an instrument of population control and elimination of the lineage of undesired people. People with dark skin and African descent are in this target group. Moreover, the fact that Americans insist that they would “embarrass me” with this deviant behavior supports my position, not only that homosexuality is a wrong choice, but also, that indeed, those imposing that choice know that it is a wrong choice.
Moreover, just because they believe that they could dictate to African Americans does not mean that they have the right to extrapolate such imposition of denigration onto this African individual.Such a tendency [the typology of choosing winners and losers, regardless of effort and capability] is oppressive, tyrannical and regressive. But, what has been done in this case is worse than choosing winners and losers; it is creating Master-slave relations with the mindset that whatever the Master tells the slave to do the slave would do. The extension of this reasoning is that if the slave refuses to obey the Master, then the Master would have to force out obedience from the slave. If such force fails, then, the Master would have to be oppressive, torturous and even violent. This is exactly the situation of the instant case. In the mapping of these Master-slave relations, the Master is the knoll and the slave is the valley part of the topography. This is exactly what Americans have seized and confined me to implement against me. If this fails, then, many hearts would be broken.
Why would something as egregious and offensive as described here take place in United States with its professed adherence to constitutionalism, the rule of law, freedoms, rights and liberty? Better yet, where did all the liberals and progressives in American go for such a thing to happen to a person of African origins when such are the people[minorities?] whose causes leftist claim to champion? Of course, many of you reading this question already know that the alleged liberal-progressive defense of minorities in America is negative patronage, a notion washed up with hypocrisy. But that would be another discussion in another publication.
What of the vociferous constitutionalists, those who champion the cause of the rule of law, individual rights, freedom and liberty, the right to pursue happiness; albeit, defenders of inalienable rights, the conservatives, where have they been for such denigration and dehumanization that implicate the gene of their belief system [their core values?] to take place in United States without protest? When at all, do universal principles matter?
After years of keenly observing the workings of the American system, in particular, in the context of this case, I have arrived at a common answer for both questions. And it is a simple answer, bipartisanism; situations of belief and policy on which the two main opposing parties in United states agree. Since in this discussion reference to parties is not limited to the GOP and the Democrat Party per se, I have concluded that the the concept, Americanism, aptly describes this phenomenon more than bipartisanism. Still, for all analytical purposes both concepts are inter-operative.
If the issue is bipartisan, in United States, it is accepted that most Republicans and most Democrats share in the belief giving rise to the issue and support the policy derived from that issue. This would be similar for conservatives and liberals, the right and left. Of course, the center is icy, and therefore, middle ground issues usually chill into one of the dichotomies. In other words, a center does not exist in bipartisanism, because, it is conflated into the two main competing sides.
Another sense in which the concept is at play is as in my case, where in addition to the agreement among the poles described above, similar consensus has been built between whites and blacks, males and females, old and young, heterosexual and homosexual, citizen and immigrant, majority and minority to frame, oppress, humiliate and destroy this African to protect America. This is bipartisanism put together by US Intelligence and politicians in the age of the American Century. I define this phenomenon as Americanism. By extension, this means that Americans have to unite whenever one or some of them have an issue with a non-American. Is there something wrong with Americans uniting to protect their interests and security?
Of course, the keener observer would notice that reference herein made to unity is to suggest that force is used to make individuals compliant in situations where they would have behaved differently. These situations include where the American, otherwise, would be the one who was at fault, but to whose side the people are instigated to rally. Americans can't allow American fail in as much as justice would benefit the other. This is the aspect of Americanism at play in my case. The issue could be or not about national interest. The only requirement needed to invoke Americanism is that a party to such a conflict is American.
White and black, conservative and liberal, man and woman, boy and girl, citizen and immigrant, Republican and Democrat, believe that those who violated me must be protected, even if that means that I continue to suffer till I drop dead here in United states. In fact, “We should all support America,” remains the fabric of the societal agreement to carry on with the conspiracy. “ Otherwise, society would fall and hearts would be broken” “He is capable of destroying community.” In this sense of Americanism, America does no wrong. “After all, Bill Gates acquired the guy, there should be no fear subjugating him.” With this mindset, diversion from absolute loyalty and the slightest sign of unfettered allegiance requite severe punishment from Americana. The media, courts, ethnicities, bureaucracies, social, political and civil organizations must respond commonly to this loyalty compliance feed system to protect America. “The guy was acquired.” America must protect this system of acquisition, namely, enslavement, no matter how specious the conspiracy. If such acquisition actually took place, it would still be a crime, an egregious violation of the Universal declaration of Human Rights
When the message is communicated to the people then that Ohene is in CHAINS, that he is the white man's dog, so acquired for experiments and to be a homosexual, every body is expected to treat him with disrespect, because, he is a slave, he has the social rank of a domesticated animal and he lives a deviant lifestyle. In the American Century, even if the people know otherwise, they would be told to shut up and play for America. This is the system of absolute loyalty and unfettered allegiance, the choking of expression and the closure for liberty, Americanism.
Even African Americans do not find such denigration likened to their status revolting and objectionable. Some of them are relieved to see Africans suffer in this country.In fact, one of them uses the Akan phrase for "suffer" ["di eyaw" or "di yaw"] to convey the level of her satisfaction with the dire predicament that I face in this case in America. Similarly, following African American hate examples, Americans taunt me with "enjoy or experience poverty" ['di hia' or 'di ohia']. To the satisfaction of the slave drivers, the American public actually loves these dehumanizing taunts and mistreatment.
Most of them are comforted to see me tortured and oppressed. In San Francisco, Africans Americans are comforted to know that I am treated like a slave and homosexual, social categories designed to isolate some of them from modernity. For them this is exoneration that all people of African ancestry must serve and obey the white man, freedom and liberty eschewed, or better yet, must be preserved for whites and Americans. African/Black Americans have made huge emotional investments in this case, and as such, if the programs stop, or if I am let go alive, African/Black American hearts would be broken.
As so-called defenders of the system that denigrates them, African Americans have their own agenda of torment and punishment for Africans like me. This is why the elite among them [the slave drivers] have actively led the oppressive activities against me in United States. Despite civil rights agitations and public postures that tend to suggest fraternity with Africans, I am convinced that this is the level of bipartisanship that has provide white violators in the case protection against prosecution for these human rights violations. African American elite extend the ends of their chains to black people for white acceptance., perhaps, mutual protection, confident that Africans would never figure it out. They feel so superior to Africans so as to believe that they are shielded from exposure just by the very fact of that sense of that feel superiority. Is this false consciousness? Whatever this is, the black-white bipartisanship provided the comfort zone not only for the slave raiders, but also, for the gay and sex change practitioners, who would also be heart broken, should I end up not being homosexual. Do you see how a hate crime of this horrible nature has been turned into a project of emotions by supremacist, African/Black Americans and homosexuals?
The failure of the effort to extend American exploitative, punitive and oppressive relations mediated by African Americans and gays to me is what this scandal is all about. When United States sends troops to attack a Ghanaian studying in Canada to STOP his advancement, this is not a political matter resolvable in-house in America, because, the Ghanaian is not a member of the American polity. This is an international criminal matter, which calls for audience in an appropriate international forum. If the objective of the US raid on this Ghanaian was to show that US could extend its domination to all people of African ancestry, and to prove that as far as US is concerned, all people of African origins can and must be enslaved, or must be mistreated, oppressed and dominated by white people, then, this is more than an international political issue. I hope that the African Union would wake up to this missive, because, this is a declared biological warfare against Africans.
If United States leaders and its most mentioned businessman in connection with this case, Bill Gates, believe that due to their power and money, they would acquire me against all reason and laws, interfere in my life to prevent me from succeeding against prudence, impose homosexual programs on to humiliate me and stunt my lineage in violation of all international human rights laws, then, I would expect that all reasonable, civilized and conscientious people would find such activities to be unlawful and objectionable. If Americans are concerned not with the destruction of my life, career and family, but, instead, with all the soft American hearts broken, then, this is vile Americanism. This is why I have resolved that I will break more of these hearts rather than allow the enemy to break my family or me.
Ohene Boakye-Yiadom
TRAFFIC LINKS
Get Traffic Supremacy now... Click here!
CHECK OUT TRAFFIC SUPREMACY!
WEBSITES2.0, FREE EVERY MONTH! CLICK HERE.
ADVERTYZE.COM
Sunday, February 6, 2011
THE LAW MAY BE SUPREME
Publisher's Note:
It appears as if the law is supreme. Or, perhaps international pressure works where human rights violations are at issue.I am publishing the article below[originally published by the Guardian of UK] to show that the powerful might still have to answer to the law. This unauthorized publication is in sync with my decision to accept or re-publish articles that address the human rights theme of the blog.The lesson from this publication is educate and be educated.
Unfortunately, I have to pull out the said publication due to concerns of duplication, which as my readers may have noticed, was neither contemplated nor intended. This site just as my other sites will always be rich with ideas to keep the theme going. I hope that those who believe in keeping rules would also support the law when it comes to violations such as discussed at my sites.I wish to assure affiliates that duplication is not a practice at my websites.
Ohene Boakye-Yiadom
It appears as if the law is supreme. Or, perhaps international pressure works where human rights violations are at issue.I am publishing the article below[originally published by the Guardian of UK] to show that the powerful might still have to answer to the law. This unauthorized publication is in sync with my decision to accept or re-publish articles that address the human rights theme of the blog.The lesson from this publication is educate and be educated.
Unfortunately, I have to pull out the said publication due to concerns of duplication, which as my readers may have noticed, was neither contemplated nor intended. This site just as my other sites will always be rich with ideas to keep the theme going. I hope that those who believe in keeping rules would also support the law when it comes to violations such as discussed at my sites.I wish to assure affiliates that duplication is not a practice at my websites.
Ohene Boakye-Yiadom
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)