JOHN QUINCY ADAMS SAID
When you hear of John Quincy Adams you think of a great US founder, president and principal contributor to the Federalist Papers. Of course, while father and son John Adams and John Quincy Adams were great presidents, it was the former[a political theorist] who was founder and principal contributor to the Federalist Papers. Some Americans still remember that John Quincy Adams was a lawyer. But how many actually know that he was a human and civil rights-minded lawyer who actually appeared before the Supreme Court of the United States to defend the inherent rights of Africans slaves? This question and its answer offer the teaching moment for this piece, another in line with my purpose to widely publicize US crimes against humanity committed against me in broad day light, and they have been committed with the conviction that as African I am naturally unfree and inferior, and therefore, I deserved to be enslaved and mistreated. The lesson for this moment is John Quincy Adams would argue that any form of enslavement in United States would be uncivilized, regressive and unconstitutional. Do you or do you not agree?
This publication is about the elements of slavery and peonage and the education to implement such activities against me in support of US eugenics and ethnic cleansing programs that targeted me ever since I set foot on the North American continent. Wherever he is in his grave John Quincy Adams [May his soul rest in peace] would be turning his head and gnashing his teeth to learn that not only have Presidents and lawyers who came after the pioneers abandoned the sacred creed of liberty for their failure to stand up to stamp out a program openly described as "enslavement" and sponsored by US elite, but also, that such dehumanizing and regressive program is co-managed by African Americans, descendants of slaves; people who most of all should epitomize the quest for freedom and liberty.
America is at a sad trajectory in its history when the beneficiaries of the Emancipation Proclamations now lead programs and projects to enslave Africans for either profit or revenge. In United States, most Black Americans I meet have revenge and anger written all over their faces as if they have proof that my family actually sold any of their descendants. This type of juvenile reaction to a historical epoch, which neither they nor I actually took part in creating is however part of US undeclared policy to use Black Americans to harass Africans on the continent. Is it not a sad story that even in the era of President Obama, a man whose father was African, Black Americans would be paid or instigated by leading Americans to kill or even undermine Africans in United States?
In this particular case, the alleged slave trader, Bill Gates or Nancy Pelosi[Kapitalist] is the one urging Black Americans not only to harass me, but, use such form of social violence to oppress me or even push me out of United States. Some black American elite, as I have indicated elsewhere in this publication actually get paid to harass or even kill Africans in United States. These people, slave drivers or managers are part of the legitimizing process in this regressive activity in United States. Later in this publication, I will share with the reader what lawyer John Quincy Adams believed and thought about the African peoples, belief and thought which today's leaders and lawyers have either abandoned due to a compromise of their values and virtues or are too coward to muster.
If there is any aspect of the US program to destroy me that should shock the conscience of the world, civilized and uncivilized, then that is the enslavement aspect [In absence of the satanic attack component]. Due to its checkered past and infamy with this dehumanizing social institution, and particularly, due to the fact that United States promotes itself as the beginning and end of all liberties; the protector of human rights and main adherent of inalienable rights [a la the US Constitution], it would sound almost pejorative to measure United States with any policy or program, official or unofficial, aimed purposefully at enslavement, subjugation, dehumanization or denigration of an individual or a group; to wit any program that debunks in the least the idea of liberty. Unfortunately, this exactly is what this 'program' to ruin me has been; an enslavement program created and nurtured by United States.
The seriousness of this specific violation is that United States has codified laws prohibiting the same, or activities that would amount to or mimic enslavement or peonage activities. The First Amendment, which underscores the inalienability of liberty [a natural right], the Eight Amendment, which forbids cruel, wicked and inhuman treatment and the Thirteenth Amendment, which sanctions peonage and all forms of slavery activity, on paper, are effective reinforcement of the Emancipation Statutes enacted since the 1860s to ensure that no policy, program or even conspiracy to erect in any manner, shape or form, the institution of slavery would not be found to be illegal, unlawful and unconstitutional.
The equal protection clauses of the US Constitution, as well, serve caution on politicians, businesses and institutions that might be too power-drunk, albeit, regressive, as to envisage having their own slaves in modern America, as envisaged by those in this case. It is a sad note in this report that exactly this is what happened and what I am about to describe. Let American patriots, those who actually hurt and feel pain, whenever America's image is tarnished by some infamous or prohibited conduct of Americans, listen. Patriotism is not simply answering a nation's call to pick up arms and kill other people, to hate those who were born here or who are unlike us. Patriotism, love of nation, also means doing those things that would hold high the name and image of your nation in the minds of other people. Certainly, engaging in slavery, enslavement education or peonage activities or hating people from other nations and sabotaging their own life plans do not make one patriotic. But, this is what has happened in this case.
In order to show that the practice of slavery is legally, constitutionally and humanly objectionable, I offer this working definition: According to Dehumane.Org, an online dictionary, slavery exists “When a person (called master) has absolute power over another (called slave) including life and liberty.” Wikipedia, another online dictionary defines slavery as.”..a system under which people are treated as property and are forced to work forced.” Wikipedia explains further that “Slaves can be held against their will from the time of their capture, purchase or birth, and deprived of the right to leave, to refuse to work, or to demand compensation.”
From the foregoing definitions, it is apparent that slavery entails loss of liberty, mistreatment that insinuates that some person is property or is owned, a situation that mimics seizure of some person or that some person is held against his or her will by another. Slavery entails deprivation of rights, including, but, not limited to the right to work, associate or to leave the place of slavery. These features of slavery persist in my situation in United States, where in San Francisco, Nancy Pelosi and others believe that they have the social and international locks on me, because, thus far, there has not been either leadership or mass objection to this crass form of dehumanization. Even lawyers are on record of supporting the program to enslave me in United States.
I can say for sure that since the late 1980s in Canada, this has been the type of situation I have known in North America. I am aware that presently in San Francisco, security agents of United States, California and County of San Francisco have been detailed to track me and kill me should I make the effort to escape. Homosexuals and Black American Muslims are also said to be the alert for me. This supports, not my suggestion, but the suggestion of the American people that I am in slavery, bought and owned by United States and its citizens, including Bill Gates, Nancy Pelosi and perhaps Katherine Crier, and managed by Condoleezza Rice and others for profit. What? This is not fiction.
The Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, passed by the Senate on April 8, 1864, by the House on January 31, 1865, and ratified on December 6, 1865, abolished slavery as a legal institution in United States [ See Article I, Section 9 and “a person held to service or labor” in Article IV, Section 2. The Thirteenth Amendment, in direct terminology, put an end to this].
The amendment states:
Section 1:
"Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
Section 2:
Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation."
In a later publication, I will show that some aspects of this enslavement program is said to be for punishment purposes, although, I have not been convicted of any violation in United States or anywhere subject to their jurisdiction. At that time, I will also show that the US Congress has acted against the spirit and letter of all appropriate legislation or statutes that prohibit enslavement and its legacies with its support for the programs involving slavery.
Prior to enactment of the Thirteenth Amendment, a man who became US President, John Quincy Adams represented slaves before the Supreme Court, and made an impassioned argument for their freedom, in the case of the Amistad Survivors. The Court, in United States v. Libellants of Schooner Amistad, 40 U.S. 518 (15 Pet. 518), 10 L. Ed. 826, affirmed the district court and agreed with John Quincy Adams that the Africans were free persons.
Why did John Adams refuse to join other white people to oppress and enslave the Amistad Survivors? The answer is pretty straight forward: He was a man of conviction, a thorough scholar who believed in the principles of the First Amendment and dignity of people no matter their racial background. He believed that liberty was a God-given right to be enjoyed by Asians, Europeans, Africans and, indeed, all mankind. Not Surprisingly, the Supreme Court of United States agreed with him. Can we have lawyers and leaders stand up with the same conviction in United States in 2011?
Unfortunately, it appears as if there are no John Adamses in today's lawyers and leaders. If there were, those would be the ones who would remind the violators in this case of how regressive and [un]patriotic it would be for anybody in to think of it, let alone institute programs to enslave Africans in United States. Even the Black American apostles of civil liberties, those of the religious conviction that all people are born to be treated justly appear to support this egregious violation. They also seek revenge.
The Thirteenth Amendment itself does not apologize for slavery in United States [some Europeans too were enslaved]. However, prior to the presidential elections of 2008, the Congress passed a resolution to apologize for slavery and all its legacies. I have gone to this extent to retract history to show that this program, which Americans believe is slavery and enslavement education is illegal and prohibited in United States, and the political leaders of this country have shown on paper that they do not subscribe to such dehumanization or condone it. In practice however, the story is different. United states has taken the backward slide from civilization.
I have also shown that even US Courts and a famous US President agreed that Africans, natural persons just as Asians and Europeans, have natural rights and freedoms equivalent to those described in the First Amendment. Africans are not robots made in some German or Japanese factory to mimic human beings. Africans have souls, blood, emotions and aspirations. Africans even pray to a God, just as Europeans do. Africans marry, work and reproduce. Africans do not need permission from white people to do any of these things. I do not need permission from any American, white or black, to do anything that I wish to do in life.
Consequently, there has to be personal hatred or resurgence of some congenital hatred for people of African descent, to explain why Africans in general are deemed undeserved of these rights, and why I in particular, have been targeted to this degree of dehumanization by United States. I believe that I have underscored these two factors in my discussions and I would refer to them often in future.
With that in mind, I now turn to explanations offered by Americans themselves for why United States and its citizens believe that they have the right to enslave me. This is no fiction.
1. I was awarded scholarships by St. Jerome's University in Waterloo, Ontario, Canada and Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, for undergraduate and graduate studies. Towards the end of my graduate program, I received a bursary stipend form the Canadian International Development Agency [CIDA]. Also, when I enrolled in Ottawa University Law in 1993 [As the first evidence of the assault against me, my enemies used Satanic attacks to force me out of Ottawa, and so, I had to withdraw from the LLB. Program], I received a government guaranteed loan and a small subvention for my studies. According to Americans, the money I received as scholarships, stipends, bursaries, subventions, etc, was taxpayers' money, and therefore, I have been enslaved forever by the taxpayers in return. The money was not from the US Treasury and USAID did not grant me the scholarships. So wherein lies the rationality about “taxpayers' money” for which the US should enslave me to repay?
This suggestion has left me with at least, two scenarios from which to infer;
A. Some people actually suggest that St Jerome's, the first university to award me scholarship money sold me to United States and Bill Gates for them to use me as a 'guinea pig' for medical research and homosexual experiments, after the university had secretly practiced the experiment on me. This would be a darn serious human rights violation, would it not? The paucity in this suggestion relates to the fact that the President of St. Jerome's, when I was enrolled, was a United States citizen, and an alleged spy for United States and Vatican, a man who apparently did not like me. The results of his hatred are not fictitious.
Father Norman Choate allegedly started the program of sexual harassment, abuse and secret medication against me at St Jerome's, where he sarcastically named me “The Monkey,” because he believed that I was a down syndrome of a type, not quite cut for college stuff, but quite cut for experiments. Instead, I would be better used as a guinea pig in America, where Kapitalists and medical researchers need raw materials for their investments and experiments. I still cannot believe that a Catholic Father and head of the university which offered me the opportunity to advance was the one who came out with such suggestion to deal with the “noble savage”[another termed he allegedly coined for me]. So, he had to fulfill the cause of his people, Americans and Kapitalists.
Bill Gates and his cohorts mentioned in this conspiracy allegedly believe that to own a person is part of capitalism, and therefore, as kapitalists, they have the right to own me and use me for whatever they want, but particularly, for profit. Apparently, the US government supports this view and conduct, despite the fact that it is aware that the conduct is illegal, unconstitutional and offensive. I am reminded that, maybe, Adam Smith would not agree if he were alive today, that the Wealth of Nations depended on slavery. However, I will accept correction from members of the Adams Smith Society.
2.The second tale, also suggested by Americans is that the US government and its citizens, either bought me from or transferred me from the Canadian government to be enslaved and re-educated to make me see myself as inferior and a slave to white people. Part of this explanation is that, Americans felt that the Canadians had failed to properly control and destroy me as secretly plotted. Particularly, Americans admonished Canadians for allowing me to get college education, when what had been agreed upon was slavery education. Worse still, allowing me to express myself in classrooms, seminars and workshops was a mistake. They, the Americans, used to watch me in Canadian classrooms via video and satellite and wondered why Canadians allowed a slave to express himself at all.
They, the Americans, weaned at oppressing and destroying black people, and apparently proud of it, decided to get me down here to complete the enslavement and ruination activities. Americans intended to “reprogram” me not only to make me abandon pursuit of academic and professional goals, but also, to make me see white people as my Masters and superiors. I was supposed to be an alcoholic, drug abuser, criminal and failure. In this way, white Americans intended to appease African Americans that I am not better than Black Americans. The latter have as a result supported this program. The sociology of race in social structuring is part of the goals of the social engineering aspects of the program. Apparently, United States ran out of Black American guinea pigs and so extended the search to Africans.The message is disheartening and alarming: United States has a universal paradigm of [dis]respect and disregard for peoples of African origins, and perhaps, even pose a security threat to such peoples. This is not simply about Ohene Boakye-Yiadom. Still, let us continue to use him as the case study.
But, of course, this does not make sense, you might suggest. But it does. The tale source credited to Condoleezza Rice and allegedly sealed by Nancy Pelosi is that I am neither Ghanaian nor African, but, in fact, Black American, a descendant of American bought slaves who ESCAPED to Africa, then sought scholarship to study in Canada, in the belief that white American slave owners could never capture me. But using modern technology, the sharp eyes and minds of its INTELLIGENCE, of course led by Condoleezza Rice and Cathy Marshall[currently the leading EYE], United States spotted me in Canada. They deployed MAGIC and super TECHNOLOGY to CAPTURE me back to enslavement in United States. This is why I should be tortured, re-educated and re-inducted. Do you love this story or not?
You see, the Americans love IT, no matter how specious all this sounds. This is the type of psychology the powerful few have used to control and repress the powerless majority in United States since the Cold War. And by the way, both Condoleezza Rice and Nancy Pelosi are known great STORY TELLERS in America. In United States, “I am telling a story,” simply means, “ I am telling a lie.” Why would an African American be associated with such a specious conspiracy against an African scholar? Is there a white American behind the scenes feeding on the effrontery of Condoleezza Rice and African Americans? Why have no Black Americans [Alf Israel, for instance] openly spoken up about this case, if African Americans have been used as the “doormat” for this crime? Why we ponder answers to these questions, I would like to introduce the third version of the story line about the enslavement program.
3.A third explanation connects Ghana and my family to the alleged purchase. Earlier on, in 1995-98, I used to hear that, “ME bought you from your father.” Although some people tried to confuse me about “the father,” by claiming this was my birth father [just as my family should be Katherine Crier, Condoleezza Rice or some other American, not Ghanaians], I eventually deduced that "father” here referred to Father Norman Choate, President of St. Jerome's who allegedly started and spread the medication attack, satanic torture and programs that are now full blown American operated.
This failure to confuse me proved that ATOR, TOPROLL and similar drugs for memory erosion that have used against me had their limits. Of course, I would be the last to believe that those seeking ways to kill or destroy me with prescription drugs and injections in San Francisco have given up. In particular, indifference to my reports about such misconduct by US authorities has emboldened the conspirators to continue with this nefarious objective. For example, narcotics and alcoholic attacks continue in the hospitals against me in San Francisco where the now shaken conspirators wish that I would simply drop dead. That is, after failure of the suicide trick, they want me to kill myself for the enemy's cover up. From Florida where he hides, I hear that Father Norman still is on his conspiracy game. I believe that the citizens among others have coded either him or his second "YOUR."
4.The purchase connection with the government of Ghana was that, indeed, either US bought me from Ghana or obtained permission from Ghana to use me as 'guinea pig,' and in exchange, provide Ghana with foreign aid, after US agents convinced Ghanaian leaders that I was an enemy of my own country. In other words, even if I say that I am not a descendant of American bought slaves, then, the Kapitalist would show that there is enough money in America to spend on enslaving and destroying me. This time, United States and the Kapitalist would take the purchase program to Ghana and get the Ghanaian leadership on board. Ghana as I have learned from Americans was sold on the idea and money.
This arrangement, if true, began during the Rawlings era, late 1980s. This was the time of World Bank, IMF and western organizations pervasive infiltration to Ghana in the name of structural adjustment programs. President Clinton visited Ghana at a time when I was sending scores of letters to the White House and the President of Ghana about my situation. But, the situation worsened from that time onwards. Was it not ironic that President Clinton in 1995 apologized for the Tuskegee Project, [a US government syphilis research which used 399 Black men from the Macon area in Georgia and watched as most of them untreated dropped dead one by one], while he was indifferent to a similar program on me? Apparently, US somehow got Ghana involved in the conspiracy without Ghana being aware of the lies and deception sold to it by America.
Notable among these was that I hated Rawlings because he was Ewe and his father was Irish. From what I have been able to glean thus far, US offered to kill me for Rawlings. Such a killing was to be extrajudicial and for the purpose of RITES, and not for the sake of the leadership in Ghana. If I hated Rawlings because of his parentage, then, it means I hated his parents, right? This is exactly what the enemy has tried to showcase against me, especially, with white audiences. The fact is that I bore Rawlings or no Ghanaian leader hatred. I only disagreed with certain policy directions in Ghana and as a bona fide Ghanaian, I have the right to participate in the policy debates in Ghana. Let no American tell me that I do not have the right to talk about Ghana.
Ghana's role in the conspiracy allegedly accentuated during the Kuffor Presidency [2000-20008], because, as a fellow Akan, Americans feared that Kuffor could expose this crime, unlike the Ewe Rawlings. The Bush and Kuffor governments forged ties, which cemented the Ghana -USA alliance. These Presidents and their governments visited each other two times for a total of four. During these eight years, I sent my most eloquent pleadings to both Presidents, but my situation worsened, each time I did. Most of the damages and personal injuries I have accumulated or worsened during the eight years of Bush-Kuffor administrations.
Both Presidents are lawyers, and therefore, resolved[it is alleged] to help the lawyer who is alleged to be at the center of the gay scam in the case. Sadly, unlike John Quincy Adams, these lawyers and presidents could not stand up for liberty. What would John Quincy Adams think or say about today's lawyers and leaders who cannot stand up to witness that Africans are free people?
The news is whenever I managed to get the Ghanaian leadership's attention to the matter, the Americans symbolically transferred ownership to Condoleezza Rice, on the assumption that Africans would not expose her, being someone with African blood who has achieved fame and popularity. Instead, they would blame me and ask for my head. African leaders would suggest that I should be sacrificed for this Kapitalist oppression to cover up for the offenders. Of course, placing African Americans in front of the case so that white people could work from the scenes has always been the hypocritical strategy of United States in this case. But, has US going to manipulate the government and my family in Ghana against me so as to enslave me not gone too far in the betrayal of liberty?
Condoleezza Rice, it has been alleged was used as PROXY to convince not just Rawlings, but also Kuffor and Atta Mills and their governments that, either I was a criminal under investigation in United States, or I signed a contract to be used for research and experiments and in exchange marry a prosperous homosexual [gay], or that I was already destroyed, so there was no need for the leaders of Ghana to worry over me. Professor Rice or another professor she covers up for is said to be manager of the program for enslavement, gay immersion and ruination. In her role is protector of the white people in this crime, she hides those seeking my blood and body parts for rites. Even more alarming, there is information that Professor Rice herself with support from African Americans wants the program as her own reparation project. United States owns and uses Black Americans and I the African from Ghana should pay them reparations.
Whether this storyline was given to Ghana by Condoleezza Rice or not, somehow, it was, and remains an official story line from United States to Canada and Ghana about my situation. The purpose of the falsehood, of course, is to perpetually hold me in enslavement in United States. Akans phrases such as “Kamu,” literally, 'disappear within' [remain here forever] and “Waka mu,” “You are here permanently,” used by Americans to taunt and scorn me prove the intent of perpetual holding. Meanwhile, US officials tell tales to get officials from Ghana and Canada to ignore my petitions. Here, the most doubted, as far as I am concerned are the Canadians and Ghanaians. As for the Americans, they have made no nonsense of what this is; a program of enslavement, capitalist investments, medical experiments, gay immersion, ruination and, errr rites, right?
In the next publication at this site, I will continue with discussion of the reasons for the enslavement program to show why United States must acknowledge the crime and severely punish those responsible for it.
Ohene Boakye-Yiadom.
NB: Please, visit www.ohenesparadigm.org and www.nanablogspolitical.blogspot.com for more information on this American scandal. oby.
No comments:
Post a Comment